Skip to content

Conversation

[ghstack-poisoned]
oulgen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 16, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/165604

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (4 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit d440cf1 with merge base 5e480b8 (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@oulgen oulgen requested review from aorenste and jamesjwu October 16, 2025 02:24
@oulgen oulgen added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 16, 2025
@oulgen oulgen added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 16, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@aorenste aorenste left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was considering doing this too - but was concerned about people worrying about unnecessary code churn

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Starting merge as part of PR stack under #165606

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants