Skip to content

Conversation

@smessmer
Copy link
Contributor

@smessmer smessmer commented Mar 15, 2019

Stack:
    :white_circle:  #18038 Allow registering same operator schema multiple times  💚
    :black_circle:  #18090 Move schema inference to c10  💚
    :white_circle:  #18158 Allow using C10_DECLARE_TENSOR_TYPE and C10_DEFINE_TENSOR_TYPE from any namespace  💚
    :white_circle:  #18159 Fix use of c10::guts::apply  💚
    :white_circle:  #18160 Expose c10 operators to caffe2 by operator name  💛
    :white_circle:  #18161 New operator registration MVP  💚
    :white_circle:  #18162 Add functor- and function-based kernel registration API  💛
    :white_circle:  #18256 Check kernel against function schema in c10 op registration  💛
    :white_circle:  #18163 [wip] deprecated function based API  💛

This schema inference is needed by the c10 operator registration mechanism. Move it to c10.
It is going to be used by diffs stacked on top.

Differential Revision: D14491454

Differential Revision: D14491454
Differential Version: 75667663
Copy link
Collaborator

@dzhulgakov dzhulgakov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code is not changing much, so moving stuff around should be fine

Differential Revision: D14491454
Differential Version: 75960874
Differential Revision: D14491454
Differential Version: 75964011
Differential Revision: D14491454
Differential Version: 76271259
Differential Revision: D14491454
Differential Version: 76377392
zdevito pushed a commit to zdevito/ATen that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2019
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#18090

This schema inference is needed by the c10 operator registration mechanism. Move it to c10.
It is going to be used by diffs stacked on top.

Reviewed By: ezyang

Differential Revision: D14491454

fbshipit-source-id: 0f8ddcdbd91467c8347d315dd443a1ca8b216481
@ezyang ezyang deleted the export-D14491454 branch May 30, 2019 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants