Skip to content

Conversation

pritamdamania87
Copy link
Contributor

@pritamdamania87 pritamdamania87 commented Nov 13, 2019

Stack from ghstack:

The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h

Differential Revision: D18467624

The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h

Differential Revision: [D18467624](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D18467624/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
pritamdamania87 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h

Differential Revision: [D18467624](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D18467624/)

ghstack-source-id: 93784971
Pull Request resolved: #29696
@pietern
Copy link
Contributor

pietern commented Nov 13, 2019

@pytorchbot retest this please

Copy link
Contributor

@pietern pietern left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The tests must pass before we can merge this, even if they look like transient errors.

LGTM otherwise. Thanks, @pritamdamania87!

The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h

Differential Revision: [D18467624](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D18467624/)

[ghstack-poisoned]
pritamdamania87 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 13, 2019
Pull Request resolved: #29696

The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h
ghstack-source-id: 93850266

Differential Revision: [D18467624](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D18467624/)
@pritamdamania87
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot retest this please

1 similar comment
@mrshenli
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot retest this please

@mrshenli
Copy link
Contributor

@yf225 @ezyang

It seems pythonbot does not trigger rerun on "/ Build Failed (pull_request)" and "/ Build Failed (push) ". I tried to rerun them manually on the following page, but still hit the same error: "- Workflows can't be executed on this repository. Please check your payment method or billing status."

https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/29696/checks?check_run_id=301851237

Is submitting a new commit the only way to trigger those two ci tests, or can we ignore them?

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Nov 14, 2019

Just rebase to master. Or ignore them.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 77bb41c.

csarofeen pushed a commit to mruberry/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 18, 2019
)

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#29696

The paths distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/dist_autograd_container.h were repetitive.

Therefore renaming these to distributed/autograd/context/context.h and
distributed/autograd/context/container.h
ghstack-source-id: 93850266

Test Plan: waitforbuildbot

Differential Revision: D18467624

fbshipit-source-id: bbf3905396f553006851af296c880c1bd106ec47
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/pritamdamania87/24/head branch November 18, 2019 15:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants