Skip to content

Conversation

@ljk53
Copy link
Contributor

@ljk53 ljk53 commented Dec 5, 2019

Stack from ghstack:

Summary:
Addressed some comments on #29550 after it's landed.

Test Plan:

LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TEST=1 CHECK_RESULT=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TORCH=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh -closure=false -debug_path=true

Differential Revision: D18835100

Summary:
Addressed some comments on #29550 after it's landed.

Test Plan:
```
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TEST=1 CHECK_RESULT=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TORCH=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh -closure=false -debug_path=true
```

[ghstack-poisoned]
ljk53 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 5, 2019
Summary:
Addressed some comments on #29550 after it's landed.

Test Plan:
```
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TEST=1 CHECK_RESULT=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TORCH=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh -closure=false -debug_path=true
```

ghstack-source-id: 58ddf1a
Pull Request resolved: #30808
@ljk53 ljk53 requested a review from smessmer December 5, 2019 07:42
Copy link
Contributor

@bddppq bddppq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@ljk53 merged this pull request in be55874.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ljk53/82/head branch December 10, 2019 15:19
wuhuikx pushed a commit to wuhuikx/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#30808

Addressed some comments on pytorch#29550 after it's landed.

Test Plan:
```
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TEST=1 CHECK_RESULT=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh
LLVM_DIR=... ANALYZE_TORCH=1 tools/code_analyzer/build.sh -closure=false -debug_path=true
```

Differential Revision: D18835100

Pulled By: ljk53

fbshipit-source-id: 991d292ddc0211a88b04d0bdc24719f471c7786e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants