Skip to content

Conversation

lara-hdr
Copy link
Contributor

The original PR is #28324

We hope we can cover torchvision models in PyTorch ONNX exporter with release 1.4. This PR is part of it.

cc: @houseroad

Lara added 2 commits December 13, 2019 16:51
Summary:
Fix for : pytorch#27176
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#28324

Reviewed By: hl475

Differential Revision: D18309133

Pulled By: houseroad

fbshipit-source-id: 348bb41393442c6b107d88fc2cd3224e0afa3ccf
@lara-hdr lara-hdr requested a review from apaszke as a code owner December 14, 2019 00:54
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue label Dec 14, 2019
@kostmo
Copy link
Member

kostmo commented Dec 14, 2019

💊 CircleCI build failures summary and remediations

As of commit 9fff611:

Commit 9fff611 was recently pushed. Waiting for builds...


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker.

This comment has been revised 9 times.

@BowenBao
Copy link
Collaborator

@spandantiwari @houseroad @gchanan @lara-hdr
I'm taking over the PR since Lara is on vacation.
Submitted the change for naming changes, from scales_1 to scales_h, etc.

@lara-hdr
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @BowenBao!
@gchanan, the PR is updated with the suggested change.

@gottbrath gottbrath requested a review from jamesr66a December 20, 2019 18:14
@gchanan
Copy link
Contributor

gchanan commented Dec 20, 2019

@BowenBao can you submit a patch against master with only the diff changes? That will be easier to review, and then we can just cherry-pick both PRs on top of each other from 1.4.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this comment looks out of date.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean False should be None? I don't have enough context here, but by looking at the code I think other than that the description is accurate. I would include this change if needed in the separate PR as well.

@BowenBao
Copy link
Collaborator

@BowenBao can you submit a patch against master with only the diff changes? That will be easier to review, and then we can just cherry-pick both PRs on top of each other from 1.4.

Submitted the separate PR against master #31526. And reverted these changes for this PR.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2020
Summary:
PR separated from #31274.
Pull Request resolved: #31526

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D19221931

Pulled By: gchanan

fbshipit-source-id: 81958a9910867ac9d62f2b47abc49384526c4e51
gchanan pushed a commit to gchanan/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2020
Summary:
PR separated from pytorch#31274.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#31526

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D19221931

Pulled By: gchanan

fbshipit-source-id: 81958a9910867ac9d62f2b47abc49384526c4e51
@zhangguanheng66 zhangguanheng66 added module: onnx Related to torch.onnx triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module and removed oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue labels Jan 14, 2020
wuhuikx pushed a commit to wuhuikx/pytorch that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2020
Summary:
PR separated from pytorch#31274.
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#31526

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D19221931

Pulled By: gchanan

fbshipit-source-id: 81958a9910867ac9d62f2b47abc49384526c4e51
@peterjc123 peterjc123 closed this Feb 5, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

module: onnx Related to torch.onnx open source triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants