Skip to content

Conversation

@zou3519
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 commented Aug 18, 2020

Stack from ghstack:

The batching rule is the same as the unary pointwise batching rules:
given a BatchedTensor, we unwrap it, call Tensor.to, and then re-wrap
it.

Test Plan:

  • pytest test/test_vmap.py -v -k

Differential Revision: D23189053

The batching rule is the same as the unary pointwise batching rules:
given a BatchedTensor, we unwrap it, call Tensor.to, and then re-wrap
it.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v -k`

[ghstack-poisoned]
@dr-ci
Copy link

dr-ci bot commented Aug 18, 2020

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 1e734c1 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


  • 1/2 failures possibly* introduced in this PR
    • 1/1 non-CircleCI failure(s)
  • 1/2 broken upstream at merge base c44b1de since Aug 17

🚧 1 ongoing upstream failure:

These were probably caused by upstream breakages that are not fixed yet:


ci.pytorch.org: 1 failed


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions on the GitHub issue tracker or post in the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

See how this bot performed.

This comment has been revised 6 times.

The batching rule is the same as the unary pointwise batching rules:
given a BatchedTensor, we unwrap it, call Tensor.to, and then re-wrap
it.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v -k`

Differential Revision: [D23189053](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D23189053)

[ghstack-poisoned]
zou3519 added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2020
The batching rule is the same as the unary pointwise batching rules:
given a BatchedTensor, we unwrap it, call Tensor.to, and then re-wrap
it.

Test Plan:
- `pytest test/test_vmap.py -v -k`

ghstack-source-id: 32bfe18
Pull Request resolved: #43206
@zou3519 zou3519 requested review from cpuhrsch and ezyang August 18, 2020 19:34
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 merged this pull request in 7d10298.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/zou3519/288/head branch August 23, 2020 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants