Skip to content

Conversation

malfet
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet malfet commented Sep 17, 2021

Replace torch.tensor([numpy.arange(a, b, c)]) with torch.arange(a, b, c).unsqueeze(0)
Replace tuple(numpy.add(a, b)) with tuple( x + y for (x, y) in zip(a, b)

As numpy is an optional dependency, it shouldn't be used in PyTorch core by default

As `numpy` is optional dependency, we should avoid using in PyTorch core
Replace `torch.tensor([numpy.arange(a, b, c)])` with `torch.arange(a, b, c).unsqueeze(0)`
Replace `tuple(numpy.add(a, b))` with `tuple( x + y for (x, y) in zip(a, b)`
@pytorch-probot
Copy link

pytorch-probot bot commented Sep 17, 2021

CI Flow Status

⚛️ CI Flow

Ruleset - Version: v1
Ruleset - File: https://github.com/malfet/pytorch/blob/974b240c66659c850ba59eeab21eb074d7dc54c6/.github/generated-ciflow-ruleset.json
PR ciflow labels: ciflow/default

Workflows Labels (bold enabled) Status
Triggered Workflows
linux-bionic-py3.6-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/noarch, ciflow/xla ✅ triggered
linux-bionic-py3.8-gcc9-coverage ciflow/all, ciflow/coverage, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc7-bazel-test ciflow/all, ciflow/bazel, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cpu-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cuda11.3-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
Skipped Workflows
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
linux-bionic-cuda10.2-py3.9-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow 🚫 skipped
linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow 🚫 skipped
parallelnative-linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.6-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.1-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
puretorch-linux-xenial-py3.6-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux 🚫 skipped
win-vs2019-cuda10.2-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped

You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands:
# ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun

# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow

For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Sep 17, 2021

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 974b240 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


None of the CI failures appear to be your fault 💚



🚧 1 fixed upstream failure:

These were probably caused by upstream breakages that were already fixed.

Please rebase on the viable/strict branch (expand for instructions)

If your commit is older than viable/strict, run these commands:

git fetch https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch viable/strict
git rebase FETCH_HEAD

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Follow this link to opt-out of these comments for your Pull Requests.

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 17, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #65188 (9bdf460) into master (0a51490) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

❗ Current head 9bdf460 differs from pull request most recent head 974b240. Consider uploading reports for the commit 974b240 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #65188      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   66.37%   66.34%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         732      732              
  Lines       93630    93684      +54     
==========================================
+ Hits        62144    62156      +12     
- Misses      31486    31528      +42     

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@malfet merged this pull request in 340531f.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants