-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Correct householder_product
docs.
#68335
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
When discussing #63880, we realised that the docs of `householder_product` were not correct. This PR fixes this. The new docs are slightly more difficult, but hopefully correct. Note that this is a LAPACK function in disguise, so it is expected the specification to be more difficult than normal. [ghstack-poisoned]
CI Flow Status⚛️ CI FlowRuleset - Version:
You can add a comment to the PR and tag @pytorchbot with the following commands: # ciflow rerun, "ciflow/default" will always be added automatically
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun
# ciflow rerun with additional labels "-l <ciflow/label_name>", which is equivalent to adding these labels manually and trigger the rerun
@pytorchbot ciflow rerun -l ciflow/scheduled -l ciflow/slow For more information, please take a look at the CI Flow Wiki. |
🔗 Helpful links
💊 CI failures summary and remediationsAs of commit 2664ce5 (more details on the Dr. CI page): 💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚 This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group. |
When discussing #63880, we realised that the docs of `householder_product` were not correct. This PR fixes this. The new docs are slightly more difficult, but hopefully correct. Note that this is a LAPACK function in disguise, so it is expected the specification to be more difficult than normal. ghstack-source-id: e62da39 Pull Request resolved: #68335
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the update!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Stamped!
@mruberry has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
Stack from ghstack:
householder_product
docs. #68335When discussing #63880, we
realised that the docs of
householder_product
were not correct. ThisPR fixes this.
The new docs are slightly more difficult, but hopefully correct. Note
that this is a LAPACK function in disguise, so it is expected the
specification to be more difficult than normal.
cc @brianjo @mruberry @jianyuh @nikitaved @pearu @walterddr @IvanYashchuk @xwang233 @lezcano
Differential Revision: D32429755