Skip to content

Conversation

pmeier
Copy link
Collaborator

@pmeier pmeier commented Feb 8, 2022

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 8, 2022

CI Flow Status

⚛️ CI Flow

Ruleset - Version: v1
Ruleset - File: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/1cc6780eae615765f500c21c6acf6cfa9e9c3536/.github/generated-ciflow-ruleset.json
PR ciflow labels: ciflow/default
Add ciflow labels to this PR to trigger more builds:

Workflows Labels (bold enabled) Status
Triggered Workflows
linux-binary-conda ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_conda, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
linux-binary-libtorch-cxx11-abi ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_libtorch, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
linux-binary-libtorch-pre-cxx11 ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_libtorch, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
linux-binary-manywheel ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_wheel, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
linux-bionic-py3.7-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/noarch, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/xla ✅ triggered
linux-bionic-rocm4.5-py3.7 ciflow/all, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/rocm, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-docs ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/docs, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-vulkan-bionic-py3.7-clang9 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/vulkan ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7-bazel-test ciflow/all, ciflow/bazel, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-build ciflow/all, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/mobile, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3-clang5-mobile-custom-build-static ciflow/all, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/mobile, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-asan ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/sanitizers, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-clang7-onnx ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/onnx, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc7-no-ops ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-gradle-custom-build-single-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cpu-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/default, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
win-vs2019-cuda11.3-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/default, ciflow/trunk, ciflow/win ✅ triggered
windows-binary-libtorch-cxx11-abi ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_libtorch, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
windows-binary-libtorch-pre-cxx11 ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_libtorch, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
windows-binary-wheel ciflow/binaries, ciflow/binaries_wheel, ciflow/default ✅ triggered
Skipped Workflows
caffe2-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
docker-builds ciflow/all, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64 ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-coreml ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-custom-ops ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-arm64-metal ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64-coreml ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
ios-12-5-1-x86-64-full-jit ciflow/all, ciflow/ios, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
linux-bionic-cuda10.2-py3.9-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/slow, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
linux-docs-push ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
linux-xenial-cuda11.3-py3.7-gcc7-no-ops ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-arm64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
macos-10-15-py3-lite-interpreter-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
macos-11-py3-x86-64 ciflow/all, ciflow/macos, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
parallelnative-linux-xenial-py3.7-gcc5.4 ciflow/all, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-libtorch-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/libtorch, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-bionic-cuda11.5-py3.7-gcc7 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda10.2-py3-gcc7-slow-gradcheck ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/slow, ciflow/slow-gradcheck 🚫 skipped
periodic-linux-xenial-cuda11.1-py3.7-gcc7-debug ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/linux, ciflow/scheduled 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.1-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
periodic-win-vs2019-cuda11.5-py3 ciflow/all, ciflow/cuda, ciflow/scheduled, ciflow/win 🚫 skipped
pytorch-linux-xenial-py3-clang5-android-ndk-r19c-build ciflow/all, ciflow/android, ciflow/cpu, ciflow/linux, ciflow/trunk 🚫 skipped

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Feb 8, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

💊 CI failures summary and remediations

As of commit 877f3f9 (more details on the Dr. CI page):


💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
ghstack-source-id: 36aac94
Pull Request resolved: #72508
@pmeier pmeier added module: testing Issues related to the torch.testing module (not tests) module: meta tensors labels Feb 8, 2022

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [ ] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]
pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 8, 2022
ghstack-source-id: 114ddfb
Pull Request resolved: #72508

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]
# https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/67517
DecorateInfo(unittest.skip("Skipped!"), "TestCommon", "test_noncontiguous_samples"),
# following 2 tests failed intermittenly
DecorateInfo(
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pmeier pmeier Feb 9, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just formatting change to keep the line length rather than ignoring flake8 complaining about it (noqa: B950). The actual added xfail is the last one in this tuple.


Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]
pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
ghstack-source-id: d2d0806
Pull Request resolved: #72508

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]
pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2022
ghstack-source-id: 0dff695
Pull Request resolved: #72508

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]

Todo:

- [ ] document this behavior
- [x] add tests


[ghstack-poisoned]
elif (
op in float_only_ops
and (not dtypes[0].is_floating_point and not dtypes[0].is_complex)
and device != "meta"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one also feels like it should still raise an error on meta.

"TestCommon",
"test_out",
device_type="meta",
),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably shouldn't fail

"TestCommon",
"test_out",
device_type="meta",
),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto, this probably also shouldn't fail

Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for doing this. Some of the test modifications seem a little questionable but I wouldn't block this PR on it, best to just handle them in follow up.

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented Feb 16, 2022

@ezyang has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@pmeier pmeier mentioned this pull request Feb 16, 2022
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @pmeier.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
@ezyang ezyang added release notes: composability release notes category topic: not user facing topic category labels Feb 17, 2022
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/pmeier/64/head branch February 20, 2022 15:16
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Feb 21, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#72508

Todo:

- [x] document this behavior
- [x] add tests

Test Plan: Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: zou3519

Differential Revision: D34262452

Pulled By: ezyang

fbshipit-source-id: bc5c9653d5c3ad5c6efccc9c8e0efc0d28e15104
(cherry picked from commit 233142c88e4cff02825c7e233aba9411a6df3e9f)
pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Two improvements here:

1. To render a bullet list correctly, a blank line before and after is needed. Compare

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732792-18071831-c7d9-4138-9002-e67e29f342fa.png)
    
    vs.
    
    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-52](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732806-1ded7a4b-ca30-46c8-89a2-5c83ea33dbe7.png)

2. #72508 added proper support for meta tensors. Thus, we no longer throw an error if we encounter them. 


[ghstack-poisoned]
pmeier added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Two improvements here:

1. To render a bullet list correctly, a blank line before and after is needed. Compare

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732792-18071831-c7d9-4138-9002-e67e29f342fa.png)
    
    vs.
    
    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-52](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732806-1ded7a4b-ca30-46c8-89a2-5c83ea33dbe7.png)

2. #72508 added proper support for meta tensors. Thus, we no longer throw an error if we encounter them. 


[ghstack-poisoned]
pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
Two improvements here:

1. To render a bullet list correctly, a blank line before and after is needed. Compare

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732792-18071831-c7d9-4138-9002-e67e29f342fa.png)

    vs.

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-52](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732806-1ded7a4b-ca30-46c8-89a2-5c83ea33dbe7.png)

2. #72508 added proper support for meta tensors. Thus, we no longer throw an error if we encounter them.

Pull Request resolved: #89620
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
Two improvements here:

1. To render a bullet list correctly, a blank line before and after is needed. Compare

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-10](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732792-18071831-c7d9-4138-9002-e67e29f342fa.png)

    vs.

    ![Screenshot from 2022-11-24 09-34-52](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/6849766/203732806-1ded7a4b-ca30-46c8-89a2-5c83ea33dbe7.png)

2. pytorch#72508 added proper support for meta tensors. Thus, we no longer throw an error if we encounter them.

Pull Request resolved: pytorch#89620
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla signed module: meta tensors module: testing Issues related to the torch.testing module (not tests) open source release notes: composability release notes category topic: not user facing topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for comparing meta tensors

6 participants