Skip to content

Conversation

@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 commented Jun 25, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: D37435748

Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jun 25, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit 15ed8ff (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@jerryzh168 jerryzh168 requested review from andrewor14 and vkuzo June 27, 2022 21:18
Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D37435748](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D37435748)

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D37435748](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D37435748)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Summary:
att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Differential Revision: [D37435748](https://our.internmc.facebook.com/intern/diff/D37435748)

[ghstack-poisoned]
@jerryzh168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerryzh168 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @jerryzh168.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #80268

att, since we need to reuse the tracer in some other places

Test Plan:
python test/test_quantization.py TestQuantizeFx

Imported from OSS

Reviewed By: dzdang

Differential Revision: D37435748

fbshipit-source-id: 82e2275d046c72389145aef1b58b911de2b06ff7
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/jerryzh168/793/head branch July 3, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants