Skip to content

Conversation

@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor

@vspenubarthi vspenubarthi commented Jul 14, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: There were accidently two lines added after a return statement
in the OutlierDetecor insertion that was not caught by either the linter
nor the tests nor i, that were harmless, but some odd merge issue. This
removes those two lines.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectOutliers

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Summary: There were accidently two lines added after a return statement
in the OutlierDetecor insertion that was not caught by either the linter
nor the tests nor i, that were harmless, but some odd merge issue. This
removes those two lines.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectOutliers

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jul 14, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit 371d736 (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -g

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed due to Refusing to merge as mandatory check(s) pull failed for rule superuser
Raised by https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/actions/runs/2672684682

Summary: There were accidently two lines added after a return statement
in the OutlierDetecor insertion that was not caught by either the linter
nor the tests nor i, that were harmless, but some odd merge issue. This
removes those two lines.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectOutliers

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
vspenubarthi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 14, 2022
Summary: There were accidently two lines added after a return statement
in the OutlierDetecor insertion that was not caught by either the linter
nor the tests nor i, that were harmless, but some odd merge issue. This
removes those two lines.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectOutliers

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

ghstack-source-id: 221ccbe
Pull Request resolved: #81499
@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -g

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2022
…81499)

Summary:
There were accidently two lines added after a return statement
in the OutlierDetecor insertion that was not caught by either the linter
nor the tests nor i, that were harmless, but some odd merge issue. This
removes those two lines.

Pull Request resolved: #81499
Approved by: https://github.com/kit1980

Test Plan:
contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/845792db3cab2c80aa6587fe7a1731cde918be8f

Test plan from GitHub:
python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectOutliers

Reviewed By: DanilBaibak

Differential Revision: D37876486

Pulled By: vspenubarthi

fbshipit-source-id: d6e6a8651710963cd326922c480b878449effcef
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/vspenubarthi/20/head branch July 18, 2022 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants