Skip to content

Conversation

@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor

@vspenubarthi vspenubarthi commented Jul 22, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: This updates the DynamicStatic Detector to also provide insight
into whether Conv layers should use dynamic or static quantization.
Before, this was not included because as of now, Dynamic quantization is
not supported for Conv layers, but this adds a check for Conv layers and
if dynamic is recommended, it will also give a disclaimer that it is not
currently supported but will be in the future.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxModelReportDetectDynamicStatic

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Summary: This updates the DynamicStatic Detector to also provide insight
into whether Conv layers should use dynamic or static quantization.
Before, this was not included because as of now, Dynamic quantization is
not supported for Conv layers, but this adds a check for Conv layers and
if dynamic is recommended, it will also give a disclaimer that it is not
currently supported but will be in the future.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxModelReportDetectDynamicStatic

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jul 22, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit b80ebdd (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

Summary: This updates the DynamicStatic Detector to also provide insight
into whether Conv layers should use dynamic or static quantization.
Before, this was not included because as of now, Dynamic quantization is
not supported for Conv layers, but this adds a check for Conv layers and
if dynamic is recommended, it will also give a disclaimer that it is not
currently supported but will be in the future.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxModelReportDetectDynamicStatic

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
Summary: This updates the DynamicStatic Detector to also provide insight
into whether Conv layers should use dynamic or static quantization.
Before, this was not included because as of now, Dynamic quantization is
not supported for Conv layers, but this adds a check for Conv layers and
if dynamic is recommended, it will also give a disclaimer that it is not
currently supported but will be in the future.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxModelReportDetectDynamicStatic

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@vspenubarthi vspenubarthi added release notes: quantization release notes category topic: new features topic category labels Jul 22, 2022
@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -g

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2022
Summary:
This updates the DynamicStatic Detector to also provide insight
into whether Conv layers should use dynamic or static quantization.
Before, this was not included because as of now, Dynamic quantization is
not supported for Conv layers, but this adds a check for Conv layers and
if dynamic is recommended, it will also give a disclaimer that it is not
currently supported but will be in the future.

Pull Request resolved: #81972
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168

Test Plan:
contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/75aab6540e24e05f52dd8f69aca9674dc1eb9a2c

Test plan from GitHub:
python test/test_quantization.py TestFxModelReportDetectDynamicStatic

Reviewed By: osalpekar

Differential Revision: D38119634

Pulled By: vspenubarthi

fbshipit-source-id: 53056b258882b387f1dec7ddbc45185e6bc26747
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/vspenubarthi/30/head branch July 26, 2022 14:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants