Skip to content

Conversation

ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Jul 28, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

This will make the pointer type a single word, which is important
for packing it into an int64_t

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang ezyang@fb.com

This will make the pointer type a single word, which is important
for packing it into an int64_t

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@fb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Jul 28, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit b37713c (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue label Jul 28, 2022
This will make the pointer type a single word, which is important
for packing it into an int64_t

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang ezyang requested a review from Krovatkin July 28, 2022 23:10
This will make the pointer type a single word, which is important
for packing it into an int64_t

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2022
This will make the pointer type a single word, which is important
for packing it into an int64_t

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

ghstack-source-id: 9a7934f
Pull Request resolved: #82432
Copy link
Collaborator

@albanD albanD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@Krovatkin Krovatkin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Jul 29, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ezyang.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Jul 29, 2022

@pytorchbot revert -m "segfaults on test but not caught in CI" -c nosignal

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ezyang your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2022
This reverts commit 7be44f8.

Reverted #82432 on behalf of https://github.com/ezyang due to segfaults on test but not caught in CI
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cla signed Merged oncall: jit Add this issue/PR to JIT oncall triage queue Reverted

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants