Skip to content

Conversation

@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor

@vspenubarthi vspenubarthi commented Aug 4, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Summary: After working on a tutorial and spending more time
experimenting with the input-weight equalization recommendation feature,
I realized that having half as the number of channels to benefit from
input-weight was too high, and that it should be a bit more lenient.
Based on the example I played around with in an internal tutorial, I
found that somewhere in the 0.3 - 0.4 threshold made more sense. In the
future, more in-depth testing and experimenting with more models may
help further fine-tune this fraction of channels that would benefit.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectInputWeightEqualization

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

Summary: After working on a tutorial and spending more time
experimenting with the input-weight equalization recommendation feature,
I realized that having half as the number of channels to benefit from
input-weight was too high, and that it should be a bit more lenient.
Based on the example I played around with in an internal tutorial, I
found that somewhere in the 0.3 - 0.4 threshold made more sense. In the
future, more in-depth testing and experimenting with more models may
help further fine-tune this fraction of channels that would benefit.

Test Plan: python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectInputWeightEqualization

Reviewers:

Subscribers:

Tasks:

Tags:

[ghstack-poisoned]
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Aug 4, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (3 Pending)

As of commit 6b05b9d (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@vspenubarthi vspenubarthi added release notes: quantization release notes category topic: improvements topic category labels Aug 5, 2022
@vspenubarthi
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pytorchbot merge -g

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2022
…82795)

Summary:
After working on a tutorial and spending more time
experimenting with the input-weight equalization recommendation feature,
I realized that having half as the number of channels to benefit from
input-weight was too high, and that it should be a bit more lenient.
Based on the example I played around with in an internal tutorial, I
found that somewhere in the 0.3 - 0.4 threshold made more sense. In the
future, more in-depth testing and experimenting with more models may
help further fine-tune this fraction of channels that would benefit.

Pull Request resolved: #82795
Approved by: https://github.com/jerryzh168

Test Plan:
contbuild & OSS CI, see https://hud.pytorch.org/commit/pytorch/pytorch/5ca098fe3891f7151d73223c38e909aa9dd5c862

Test plan from GitHub:
python test/test_quantization.py TestFxDetectInputWeightEqualization

Reviewed By: kit1980

Differential Revision: D38478780

Pulled By: vspenubarthi

fbshipit-source-id: 3e278dd5d3f821b031cf4193f31d28fd635b2850
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/vspenubarthi/12/head branch August 9, 2022 14:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants