Skip to content

Conversation

@yixin94
Copy link

@yixin94 yixin94 commented Aug 10, 2022

Differential Revision: D38566988

Differential Revision: D38566988

fbshipit-source-id: abfdf707bc242128f145b0700f37d505b79e663c
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

facebook-github-bot commented Aug 10, 2022

🔗 Helpful links

✅ No Failures (0 Pending)

As of commit c64cca8 (more details on the Dr. CI page):

Expand to see more

💚 💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚 💚


This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI (expand for details).

Please report bugs/suggestions to the (internal) Dr. CI Users group.

Click here to manually regenerate this comment.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38566988

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @yixin94.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
Summary: Pull Request resolved: #83147

Reviewed By: soumith, terrycsy, drdarshan

Differential Revision: D38566988

fbshipit-source-id: 5efe333e42e777cb74cdda6b7eea199385c8dd2e
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants