Skip to content

Conversation

dagitses
Copy link
Collaborator

Summary:
We extract the test to its own target, fixing the relative path to the
quantization docs. This allows us to find the docs with a more simple
implementation.

Test Plan: Tested locally with buck1 and buck2.

Differential Revision: D38662169

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Aug 12, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/83341

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit c4eaed3:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

5 similar comments
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #83341

We extract the test to its own target, fixing the relative path to the
quantization docs. This allows us to find the docs with a more simple
implementation.

Test Plan: Tested locally with buck1 and buck2.

Reviewed By: r-barnes

Differential Revision: D38662169

fbshipit-source-id: ab23f0b8c06ef5249bbb6c0c43f919c554409656
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D38662169

Copy link
Contributor

@ZainRizvi ZainRizvi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one potential bug. Otherwise looks great.

# no longer passing when file not found
raise FileNotFoundError("could not find {}".format(path_from_pytorch))
core_dir = Path(__file__).parent
assert core_dir.match("test/quantization/core/"), (
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you want this assert to also fail if test_docs.py is moved to a subdirectory of test/quantization/core/?

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@pytorchbot merge

(Initiating merge automatically since Phabricator Diff has merged)

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here.
The merge job was triggered without a flag. This means that your change will be merged once all checks on your PR have passed (ETA: 0-4 Hours). If this is not the intended behavior, feel free to use some of the other merge options in the wiki.
Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team with feedback or questions!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @dagitses.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2022
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: #83341

We extract the test to its own target, fixing the relative path to the
quantization docs. This allows us to find the docs with a more simple
implementation.

Test Plan: Tested locally with buck1 and buck2.

Reviewed By: seemethere, huydhn, r-barnes

Differential Revision: D38662169

fbshipit-source-id: 29704646353a44e82b1d877eeedc6adbec92352a
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants