Skip to content

Conversation

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Sep 20, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Sep 20, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/85370

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 6 Failures

As of commit a72be5c:

The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@ezyang ezyang requested review from Chillee and eellison September 20, 2022 20:44
For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Sep 20, 2022

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here.
The merge job was triggered without a flag. This means that your change will be merged once all checks on your PR have passed (ETA: 0-4 Hours). If this is not the intended behavior, feel free to use some of the other merge options in the wiki.
Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team with feedback or questions!

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: The following mandatory check(s) failed (Rule superuser):

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 20, 2022
For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>

ghstack-source-id: 3c2681d
Pull Request resolved: #85370
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Sep 21, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f "ci flakiness"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a merge job. Check the current status here.
The merge job was triggered with the force (-f) flag. This means your change will be merged immediately, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). If this is not the intended behavior, feel free to use some of the other merge options in the wiki.
Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team with feedback or questions!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ezyang.
You've committed this PR, but it does not have both a 'release notes: ...' and 'topics: ...' label. Please add one of each to the PR. The 'release notes: ...' label should represent the part of PyTorch that this PR changes (fx, autograd, distributed, etc) and the 'topics: ...' label should represent the kind of PR it is (not user facing, new feature, bug fix, perf improvement, etc). The list of valid labels can be found here for the 'release notes: ...' and here for the 'topics: ...'.
For changes that are 'topic: not user facing' there is no need for a release notes label.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ezyang/1400/head branch September 24, 2022 14:20
mehtanirav pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2022
For some reason, this change didn't actually make it to master.

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangfb.com>
Pull Request resolved: #85370
Approved by: https://github.com/eellison
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants