Skip to content

Conversation

@suo
Copy link
Member

@suo suo commented Oct 24, 2022

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Another casualty of the core move

cc @jansel @lezcano @fdrocha @mlazos @soumith @voznesenskym @yanboliang @penguinwu @anijain2305

Another casualty of the core move

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2022

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/87640

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 2 Failures, 2 Pending

As of commit a10ccf2:

The following jobs have failed:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

suo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2022
Another casualty of the core move

ghstack-source-id: b4d9fd9
Pull Request resolved: #87640
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Oct 24, 2022
@suo
Copy link
Member Author

suo commented Oct 24, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Oct 24, 2022

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot merge: error: argument -f/--force: expected one argument

usage: @pytorchbot merge [-g | -f MESSAGE | -l] [-r [{viable/strict,master}]]

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs a label

If your changes are user facing and intended to be a part of release notes, please use a label starting with release notes:.

If not, please add the topic: not user facing label.

For more information, see https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/PyTorch-AutoLabel-Bot#why-categorize-for-release-notes-and-how-does-it-work.

@suo
Copy link
Member Author

suo commented Oct 24, 2022

@pytorchbot merge -f "innocuous change I promise"

@suo suo added the topic: not user facing topic category label Oct 24, 2022
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2022
Another casualty of the core move
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87640
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
kulinseth pushed a commit to kulinseth/pytorch that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2022
Another casualty of the core move
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#87640
Approved by: https://github.com/voznesenskym
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/suo/594/head branch June 8, 2023 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants