Revert "Implement sparse semantics support in gradcheck (#94714)" #95386
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit 7ac511c.
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/95386
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ⏳ No Failures, 5 PendingAs of commit 5869a2e: This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
clee2000
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2023
|
@pytorchbot merge -f "This reverts commit 7ac511c" |
Merge startedYour change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes). Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
cyyever
pushed a commit
to cyyever/pytorch_private
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2023
…5386) This reverts commit 7ac511c from pytorch/pytorch#94714 since it breaks periodic. Git thinks there's a merge conflict due to an unfortunately located newline deletion, so reverting this one manually Details behind the failure in pytorch/pytorch#94714 (comment) Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#95386 Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
cyyever
pushed a commit
to cyyever/pytorch_private
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2023
…5386) This reverts commit 7ac511c from pytorch/pytorch#94714 since it breaks periodic. Git thinks there's a merge conflict due to an unfortunately located newline deletion, so reverting this one manually Details behind the failure in pytorch/pytorch#94714 (comment) Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#95386 Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
cyyever
pushed a commit
to cyyever/pytorch_private
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2023
…5386) This reverts commit 7ac511c from pytorch/pytorch#94714 since it breaks periodic. Git thinks there's a merge conflict due to an unfortunately located newline deletion, so reverting this one manually Details behind the failure in pytorch/pytorch#94714 (comment) Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#95386 Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
pruthvistony
added a commit
to ROCm/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2023
…rch#94714)" (pytorch#95386)" This reverts commit 808879e.
jhavukainen
pushed a commit
to kulinseth/pytorch
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2024
…" (pytorch#95386) This reverts commit 7ac511c from pytorch#94714 since it breaks periodic. Git thinks there's a merge conflict due to an unfortunately located newline deletion, so reverting this one manually Details behind the failure in pytorch#94714 (comment) Pull Request resolved: pytorch#95386 Approved by: https://github.com/clee2000
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This reverts commit 7ac511c from #94714 since it breaks periodic.
Git thinks there's a merge conflict due to an unfortunately located newline deletion, so reverting this one manually
Details behind the failure in #94714 (comment)