Skip to content

Conversation

ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

@ezyang ezyang commented Mar 12, 2023

Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 12, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/96624

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 3 Failures

As of commit 28ab146:

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base ba4fb9b:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 7da0200
Pull Request resolved: #96624
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from Chillee March 12, 2023 18:45
@albanD albanD removed their request for review March 13, 2023 14:20
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 553b6de
Pull Request resolved: #96624
@ezyang ezyang added ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request release notes: composability release notes category topic: new features topic category labels Mar 13, 2023
(config, "dynamic_shapes", True),
(config, "assume_static_by_default", static_default),
(config, "specialize_int", not unspec),
(config, "specialize_int", static_default),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Question: This code pairs assume_static_by_default with specialize_int; both are True or both are False (the default). Is it also conceivable to have one be True while the other False? The config in line 86 used to be assume_static_by_default = False and specialize_int = True and now means both = False.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I have reduced coverage. This is a calculated decision: assume static by default is heavily correlated with specializing ints, as these are correlated with export usage. In eager usage, we expect unspec int and not assuming static by default. There's two configs that are not tested, but I think testing them is unnecessary as we will get adequate coverage otherwise.

Copy link
Contributor

@janeyx99 janeyx99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks fine to me then

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Mar 14, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "spurious lint failure on master"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Mar 14, 2023

Looks like this broke inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py https://hud.pytorch.org/pytorch/pytorch/commit/1ac8782db244f6cd3d2fd109e3fe94500745e0dd

@kit1980
Copy link
Contributor

kit1980 commented Mar 14, 2023

@pytorchbot revert -m "Broke inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py" -c nosignal

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@pytorchbot successfully started a revert job. Check the current status here.
Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

@ezyang your PR has been successfully reverted.

pytorchmergebot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
This reverts commit 1ac8782.

Reverted #96624 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to Broke inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py
@ezyang ezyang reopened this Mar 14, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot requested a review from albanD March 14, 2023 19:59
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 5c5df59
Pull Request resolved: #96624
@ezyang ezyang added the keep-going Don't stop on first failure, keep running tests until the end label Mar 15, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: 22898ae
Pull Request resolved: #96624
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

cc soumith voznesenskym penguinwu anijain2305 EikanWang jgong5 Guobing-Chen XiaobingSuper zhuhaozhe blzheng Xia-Weiwen wenzhe-nrv jiayisunx peterbell10 desertfire

[ghstack-poisoned]
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Mar 15, 2023

@pytorchbot merge

ezyang added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyangmeta.com>

ghstack-source-id: dbcbba8
Pull Request resolved: #96624
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@albanD albanD removed their request for review March 15, 2023 14:46
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge failed

Reason: 1 mandatory check(s) failed. The first few are:

Dig deeper by viewing the failures on hud

Details for Dev Infra team Raised by workflow job

Failing merge rule: Core Maintainers

@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezyang commented Mar 16, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "failures look unrelated"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96624
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
This reverts commit 1ac8782.

Reverted pytorch/pytorch#96624 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to Broke inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96624
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96624
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
This reverts commit 1ac8782.

Reverted pytorch/pytorch#96624 on behalf of https://github.com/kit1980 due to Broke inductor/test_torchinductor_dynamic_shapes.py
cyyever pushed a commit to cyyever/pytorch_private that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
Signed-off-by: Edward Z. Yang <ezyang@meta.com>

Pull Request resolved: pytorch/pytorch#96624
Approved by: https://github.com/janeyx99
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/ezyang/1903/head branch June 8, 2023 16:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request keep-going Don't stop on first failure, keep running tests until the end Merged module: dynamo module: inductor release notes: composability release notes category Reverted topic: new features topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants