Skip to content

Conversation

wanchaol
Copy link
Collaborator

@wanchaol wanchaol commented Apr 5, 2023

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

According to @kwen2501, NCCL supports up to size_t send counts, so
PGNCCL shouldn't restrict it

A follow up is to think about whether we should add overflow protection
of offset

According to @kewen2501, NCCL supports up to size_t send counts, so
PGNCCL shouldn't restrict it

A follow up is to think about whether we should add overflow protection
of offset

[ghstack-poisoned]
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 5, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/98368

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❗ 1 Active SEVs

There are 1 currently active SEVs. If your PR is affected, please view them below:

❌ 1 Failures

As of commit 9e217c6:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base a6bd21d:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: distributed (c10d) release notes category label Apr 5, 2023
According to kwen2501, NCCL supports up to size_t send counts, so
PGNCCL shouldn't restrict it

A follow up is to think about whether we should add overflow protection
of offset

[ghstack-poisoned]
wanchaol added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2023
According to kewen2501, NCCL supports up to size_t send counts, so
PGNCCL shouldn't restrict it

A follow up is to think about whether we should add overflow protection
of offset

ghstack-source-id: eaad7b1
Pull Request resolved: #98368
Copy link
Contributor

@kwen2501 kwen2501 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change + the plan look good to me. Thanks for the quick fix!

@wanchaol wanchaol added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Apr 5, 2023
@kwen2501
Copy link
Contributor

kwen2501 commented Apr 5, 2023

@pytorchbot merge -f "The failure is in trunk and not related to this change"

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged immediately since you used the force (-f) flag, bypassing any CI checks (ETA: 1-5 minutes).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

@kwen2501 kwen2501 added the topic: bug fixes topic category label Apr 5, 2023
@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot deleted the gh/wanchaol/283/head branch June 8, 2023 19:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged release notes: distributed (c10d) release notes category topic: bug fixes topic category

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants