Skip to content

Conversation

xwang233
Copy link
Collaborator

@xwang233 xwang233 commented Apr 5, 2023

Fixes #ISSUE_NUMBER

@xwang233 xwang233 requested review from malfet and ptrblck April 5, 2023 23:38
@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the topic: not user facing topic category label Apr 5, 2023
@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 5, 2023

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/98462

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

⏳ No Failures, 2 Pending

As of commit 666760e:
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@zou3519 zou3519 added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label Apr 10, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@zou3519 zou3519 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lint needs to be fix, otherwise lgtm

@xwang233
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchmergebot merge -g

@pytorch-bot
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 10, 2023

❌ 🤖 pytorchbot command failed:

@pytorchbot: error: unrecognized arguments: -g

usage: @pytorchbot [-h] {merge,revert,rebase,label,drci} ...

Try @pytorchbot --help for more info.

@xwang233
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@pytorchmergebot merge

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request label Apr 10, 2023
@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

pytorchmergebot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 1, 2023
…2] (#102660)

Test was originally skipped in #98462

Not sure why it was removed in #94825

Now the test hits CUDA illegal memory access on H100 again after #101163

Pull Request resolved: #102660
Approved by: https://github.com/zou3519
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged merging open source topic: not user facing topic category triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants