Skip to content

Conversation

@ijlyttle
Copy link
Contributor

fix #40

I took a first swing at documentation; I will be happy to revise as you wish.

Thanks!

@cscheid
Copy link
Contributor

cscheid commented Jan 12, 2023

Thank you! Interesting, this turns out to be simpler than I thought.

@cderv this looks good to me, what do you think?

@cscheid cscheid requested a review from cderv January 12, 2023 14:45
Copy link
Collaborator

@cderv cderv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @ijlyttle !

Yes LGTM. We can't really test it but I suppose you did or can ?

@ijlyttle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @cderv - I have tested it on our instance, and it works for me™️.

Also, FWIW, because you are using the newer syntax for setting outputs, the runner version has to be at least 2.298.2.

I have a larger question about support for GitHub Enterprise, but the challenge is procedural, rather than technical. I don't think this thread is the right venue, so I'll use another venue.

@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Jan 12, 2023

because you are using the newer syntax for setting outputs, the runner version has to be at least 2.298.2.

We did the change because of this post and Github warning about deprecation. :)
So you mean our action won't work on GHE server that would run previous syntax, is that so ?

For now it would mean that you need to use a specific tag (probably @2.0.3) so that you don't get the change. We could also maintain a specific branch or specific tag if that helps.

We'll see what comes from the discussion in the other venue.

Thanks for the PR

@cderv cderv merged commit 5a4143d into quarto-dev:main Jan 12, 2023
@ijlyttle
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cderv - no worries about the change, we upgraded the runner-version ourselves recently. It was just another thing for me to learn about 😅

I agree, using a specific branch or tag could be useful here.

@ijlyttle ijlyttle deleted the feature-40-setup-ghe branch January 12, 2023 17:03
@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Jan 12, 2023

I agree, using a specific branch or tag could be useful here.

We'll see if we find other specificity then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Adapt quarto-actions/setup for use in GitHub Enterprise?

3 participants