Replies: 1 comment 6 replies
-
|
I think they should work. But I also think unless you need to be compatible with some very old systems/browsers (whose security has become a more major issue), just using the
To be honest, I don't think If it were me, I'd throw away all glue code and just use the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
@ACTCD @quoid has explained some details in #790 for GM. vs GM_ issues, the former being Promise oriented.
I am recently making an userscript where I am expecting thousands of end users for a problem it solves (not all being technical) and my script is simple enough to not bother for Promises.
for safari compatibility, I found only this and tampermonkey. I love to add compatibility to userscripts even though my default script used violentmonkey-tampermonkey three different GM_ API calls only.
As I dont have safari, i just want to cross-check if this fallbacks are decent or should I keep any other things in mind? i will be injecting all css once (i have yet to first commit the repo to show u full code) and will handle that full css styles injected once with js in script:
thanks.
Edit:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions