Difficulty understanding the protection benchmarks

[thk686]

I've read this a few times and I confess I cannot make heads or tails of the results. Perhaps I'm just reading it wrong. I thought I'd mention it incase there is a bug. I'm usually adept at interpreting plots, so if its correct, perhaps there is another way to present the data?

[hadley]

I think the labels might be flipped

[thk686]

I think that's right. I'm really enjoying using the package in my latest project, so thanks for that. THK

…

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 7:28 AM Hadley Wickham ***@***.***> wrote: I think the labels might be flipped — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#49 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEQXSOTKWODJUYDNORQL7TR4GIPLANCNFSM4O7CI64Q> .

[jimhester]

It is my mistake, I had to IFDEF the Rcpp version of that benchmark out to avoid a rchk false positive, but I forgot to set the flag when I re-ran the benchmark code. So the Rcpp version is essentially an empty function.