Skip to content

Conversation

@etiennebacher
Copy link
Contributor

@etiennebacher etiennebacher commented Oct 17, 2025

The example of absolute_path_linter was a bit confusing to me because the raw string syntax used differs between the failing and the passing cases.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.24%. Comparing base (552668b) to head (3465d95).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2948   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.24%   99.24%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines        7276     7276           
=======================================
  Hits         7221     7221           
  Misses         55       55           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Collaborator

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@MichaelChirico MichaelChirico merged commit ae6b6a7 into r-lib:main Oct 17, 2025
21 checks passed
TimTaylor pushed a commit to TimTaylor/lintr that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants