Skip to content

Conversation

@awfabian-rs
Copy link
Contributor

looks similar to a previous commit, but the actual version update got lost as I compared checksums of the serialized YAML to make sure the yamllint required changes didn't alter the structure, so I called this one a 'fix' instead of a 'chore'

looks similar to a previous commit, but the actual version update got lost as
I compared checksums of the serialized YAML to make sure the yamllint required
changes didn't alter the structure, so I called this one a 'fix' instead of a
'chore'
@awfabian-rs
Copy link
Contributor Author

awfabian-rs commented Mar 11, 2025

Previously: #882

As mentioned in the commit, I fixed the YAML carefully for that version but, but ended up with the old version while ensuring the serialized checksum matched while altering the identation

This one actually updates the image this time on the clean-linting YAML

Copy link
Contributor

@rackerchris rackerchris left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM +1

@awfabian-rs awfabian-rs merged commit 545bb18 into rackerlabs:main Mar 11, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants