[Getting Started] Use .positive? for more explicit positive checks rather than implicitly field itself [ci skip] #55863
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation / Background
In the tutorial we use
product.inventory_count?
to check if the product is in stock. This is relying on implicit rails behavior that can be confusing and hard to reason about for newcomers.Detail
This change uses
product.inventory_count.positive?
instead, which is more explicit and easier to understand. I also standardized on using it throughout the tutorial for consistency.Checklist
Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:
[Fix #issue-number]