Skip to content

Implementation inconsistencies to be considered for 6.e #472

@patrickbkr

Description

@patrickbkr

This ticket is meant to collect special cases / inconsistencies that were put into the Raku Grammar to please the tests. Such changes can point to inconsistencies / special cases in the language itself and are thus good candidates for removal in the next language version.

This is not a wishlist for language changes!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    rakudoBig changes to Rakudo

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions