Skip to content

Conversation

@vkarak
Copy link
Contributor

@vkarak vkarak commented Dec 13, 2022

Users should use -S strict_check=1 instead.

Closes #2626.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 86.58% // Head: 86.57% // Decreases project coverage by -0.00% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (e0a9518) compared to base (e5e45af).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

❗ Current head e0a9518 differs from pull request most recent head 28d69f7. Consider uploading reports for the commit 28d69f7 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2711      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.58%   86.57%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          60       60              
  Lines       11218    11213       -5     
==========================================
- Hits         9713     9708       -5     
  Misses       1505     1505              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
reframe/frontend/cli.py 73.67% <ø> (-0.09%) ⬇️
reframe/frontend/executors/__init__.py 97.64% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@vkarak vkarak merged commit 0398ce6 into reframe-hpc:master Dec 15, 2022
@vkarak vkarak deleted the feat/remove-strict-check branch December 15, 2022 21:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider removing the --strict option

3 participants