-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Nuxt 4 #375
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Nuxt 4 #375
Conversation
WalkthroughUpdated file paths for indicadores.json in CI workflow and script, adjusted a test import and added a new CDB test, added Nuxt future compatibilityVersion: 4, and upgraded Nuxt/Pinia dependencies in package.json. No behavioral control-flow changes beyond path locations and config version bump. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
actor DevOps
participant GH_Actions as "GitHub Actions\nupdate-indexes.yml"
participant Script as "update-indexes.js"
participant Repo as "Repository (app/assets/indicadores.json)"
DevOps->>GH_Actions: push commit
GH_Actions->>Script: run change-detection (checks app/assets/indicadores.json)
Script->>Repo: read app/assets/indicadores.json
Script-->>GH_Actions: return has_changes (true/false)
alt has_changes == true
GH_Actions->>Repo: git add/commit/push (app/assets/indicadores.json)
GH_Actions->>GH_Actions: trigger follow-up workflow
else has_changes == false
GH_Actions-->>DevOps: no changes detected
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used🧬 Code graph analysis (1)test/app/src/cdb.spec.ts (2)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.github/workflows/update-indexes.yml(2 hunks)nuxt.config.ts(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)test/app/src/finance.spec.ts(1 hunks)update-indexes.js(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
test/app/src/finance.spec.ts (1)
test/src/finance.spec.ts (6)
it(48-70)expect(27-30)interestAmount(49-58)testCases(4-23)interestAmount(60-69)it(26-31)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
update-indexes.js (1)
5-5: LGTM! Path updated consistently.The path change from
assets/indicadores.jsontoapp/assets/indicadores.jsonaligns with the Nuxt 4 directory restructuring and is used consistently for both reading (line 6) and writing (line 65)..github/workflows/update-indexes.yml (1)
30-30: LGTM! Workflow paths updated consistently.Both the change detection (line 30) and git add (line 40) commands correctly reference the new
app/assets/indicadores.jsonpath, which aligns with the path change inupdate-indexes.js.Also applies to: 40-40
test/app/src/finance.spec.ts (1)
2-2: Finance module verified at new location. Confirmed thatapp/src/finance.tsexists and matches the test import path; approving changes.package.json (1)
25-28: Approve Pinia integration
Pinia v3.0.3 and @pinia/nuxt v0.11.2 are officially supported in Nuxt 4 per the Nuxt 4 migration guide (nuxt.com). GitHub’s securityVulnerabilities API returned no advisories for either package.
|



Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores
Tests