-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
fix: upgrade actors by build name #2741
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: upgrade actors by build name #2741
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job Code Review CompleteI've analyzed all the changes in this PR. Here's my comprehensive review: Review Tasks:
📋 SummaryThis PR fixes actor upgrade functionality by changing how actors are upgraded to use build name instead of all build tags. The changes span across 4 files with primarily functional improvements and minor cleanup. 🔍 Changes Overview
✅ Positive Aspects
🔧 Code Quality & Best PracticesGood:
Suggestions:
🐛 Bug AnalysisCritical Fix: The main change in
This change is correct - upgrading actors should filter by build name specifically, not all build tags, which could include version and other metadata that shouldn't be used for actor selection. No new bugs identified. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security ConcernsNo security issues identified. The changes:
🧪 Test CoverageCurrent state:
Recommendations:
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid bug fix that:
Risk Level: Low |
Deploying rivet with
|
| Latest commit: |
5a3772a
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://d0448483.rivet.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://07-10-fix-upgrade-actors-by.rivet.pages.dev |
aaba101 to
431cb66
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job Code Review CompleteI've analyzed all the changes in this PR. Here's my comprehensive review: Review Tasks:
📋 SummaryThis PR fixes actor upgrade functionality by changing how actors are upgraded to use build name instead of all build tags. The changes span across 4 files with primarily functional improvements and minor cleanup. 🔍 Changes Overview
✅ Positive Aspects
🔧 Code Quality & Best PracticesGood:
Suggestions:
🐛 Bug AnalysisCritical Fix: The main change in
This change is correct - upgrading actors should filter by build name specifically, not all build tags, which could include version and other metadata that shouldn't be used for actor selection. No new bugs identified. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security ConcernsNo security issues identified. The changes:
🧪 Test CoverageCurrent state:
Recommendations:
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid bug fix that:
Risk Level: Low |
77b476c to
c1a3bf7
Compare
431cb66 to
2cb8c6d
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job Code Review AnalysisReview Tasks:
📋 SummaryThis PR fixes actor upgrade functionality by changing how actors are upgraded to use build name instead of all build tags. The changes span across 4 files with primarily functional improvements and minor cleanup. 🔍 Changes Overview
✅ Positive Aspects
🔧 Code Quality & Best PracticesGood:
Suggestions:
🐛 Bug AnalysisCritical Fix: The main change in
This change is correct - upgrading actors should filter by build name specifically, not all build tags, which could include version and other metadata that shouldn't be used for actor selection. No new bugs identified. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security ConcernsNo security issues identified. The changes:
🧪 Test CoverageCurrent state:
Recommendations:
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid bug fix that:
Risk Level: Low |
Deploying rivet-hub with
|
| Latest commit: |
5a3772a
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://15c22cdd.rivet-hub-7jb.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://07-10-fix-upgrade-actors-by.rivet-hub-7jb.pages.dev |
c888212 to
5a3772a
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Code ReviewReview Tasks:
📋 Change SummaryThis PR fixes actor upgrade functionality by changing how actors are upgraded to use build name instead of all build tags. The main changes are:
✅ Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive Aspects:
Minor Suggestions:
🐛 Bug AnalysisCritical Fix Identified: The main change in Before (inferred from context): tags: Some(serde_json::to_value(&build_tags)?)After: tags: Some(json!({
build::tags::NAME: build_name,
}))Why this is correct: The old code was filtering actors by ALL build tags (including version, current flag, and other metadata), which could lead to:
The new code correctly filters actors by build name only, which is the appropriate criteria for actor upgrades. No new bugs identified in this change. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security AssessmentNo security issues identified. The changes:
🧪 Test CoverageCurrent State:
Recommendations:
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid bug fix that addresses a real issue in the actor upgrade system: Strengths:
Risk Level: Low - The change is focused, well-understood, and addresses a specific issue Recommendation: Approve - This is a clean, focused fix that solves the stated problem Final Notes:
|
5a3772a to
c888212
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Code ReviewReview Tasks:
📋 Change SummaryThis PR fixes actor upgrade functionality by changing how actors are upgraded to use build name instead of all build tags. The main changes are:
✅ Code Quality & Best PracticesPositive Aspects:
Minor Suggestions:
🐛 Bug AnalysisCritical Fix Identified: The main change in After: tags: Some(json!({
build::tags::NAME: build_name,
})),Why this is correct: The old code was filtering actors by ALL build tags (including version, current flag, and other metadata), which could lead to:
The new code correctly filters actors by build name only, which is the appropriate criteria for actor upgrades. No new bugs identified in this change. ⚡ Performance Considerations
🔒 Security AssessmentNo security issues identified. The changes:
🧪 Test CoverageCurrent State:
Recommendations:
📊 Overall AssessmentThis is a solid bug fix that addresses a real issue in the actor upgrade system: Strengths:
Risk Level: Low - The change is focused, well-understood, and addresses a specific issue Recommendation: Approve - This is a clean, focused fix that solves the stated problem Final Notes:
|
Merge activity
|
<!-- Please make sure there is an issue that this PR is correlated to. --> ## Changes <!-- If there are frontend changes, please include screenshots. -->

Changes