chore: v5 website changes

[NicholasKissel]

No description provided.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivet-site	Ready	Preview	Comment	Nov 20, 2025 9:37pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud	Ignored			Nov 20, 2025 9:37pm
rivet-inspector	Ignored	Preview		Nov 20, 2025 9:37pm
rivetkit-serverless	Skipped			Nov 20, 2025 9:37pm

[NicholasKissel]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• Update pnpm-lock.yaml to include @vbare/compiler dependency #3490
• chore: v5 website changes #3486 👈 (View in Graphite)
• chore(website): flatten actors docs structure #3485
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Changes

I've reviewed this PR which introduces a major redesign of the marketing homepage. Here's my comprehensive feedback:

✅ Strengths

Code Quality

• Clean, well-structured React components with clear separation of concerns
• Good use of TypeScript with proper prop interfaces
• Consistent naming conventions and component patterns
• Effective use of Framer Motion for animations

Design & UX

• Modern, visually appealing design with good use of gradients and shadows
• Smooth animations that enhance rather than distract
• Responsive approach with mobile considerations (see CodeWalkthrough mobile code snippets)

🐛 Potential Issues

1. Missing Trailing Newline (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:221)

• The file is missing a trailing newline at the end
• This can cause issues with some git tools and is typically expected in most codebases

2. Array Index as React Key (CodeWalkthrough.tsx)

• Several instances use array indices as keys: key={idx} and key={i}
• Lines: 120, 133, 144, 150, 156, 205
• Risk: Can cause React rendering bugs if array order changes or items are added/removed
• Fix: Use stable unique identifiers when possible

3. Ref Array Management (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:77)

observerRefs.current[idx] = el

• Direct mutation of .current property
• Should use a callback or proper ref management pattern to avoid potential issues

4. Hardcoded Animation Keyframes (FeaturesSection.tsx)

• Custom animations like statelessChurn, statefulLifecycle, shimmer, shuttle, simplePacket, fadeZap, fadeZzz, float, boxState
• These appear to be referenced but not defined in the file
• Risk: Animations won't work unless defined in global CSS
• Fix: Define keyframes in a CSS file or use Framer Motion variants

5. Missing Error Handling (ConceptSection.tsx:12)

const interval = setInterval(() => {
  setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
}, 2000);

• No cleanup verification if component unmounts during state update
• Could potentially cause memory leaks in edge cases

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Animation Performance

• Multiple IntersectionObserver instances in CodeWalkthrough (one per step)
• Recommendation: Consider a single observer for all steps to reduce overhead

2. Re-renders on Scroll

onMouseMove={handleMouseMove} // In old FeatureCard code (now removed)

• The new code removes this, which is good for performance

3. Framer Motion Usage

• Good use of viewport={{ once: true }} to prevent re-triggering animations
• However, many components use whileInView which can be expensive
• Recommendation: For elements always in viewport, use initial + animate instead

4. Code Highlighting Logic (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:121-161)

• Splits every line on whitespace and iterates through parts
• Runs on every render when activeStep changes
• Optimization: Memoize the syntax highlighting result with useMemo

🔒 Security Concerns

No XSS Issues Found ✅

• All user-facing content is hardcoded (no user input)
• No dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage
• Proper React escaping throughout

♿ Accessibility Issues

1. Missing Semantic HTML

• Sections should use <article>, <header>, or proper heading hierarchy
• Animation containers lack ARIA labels

2. Animation & Motion

• No prefers-reduced-motion checks
• Could cause issues for users with vestibular disorders
• Fix: Add media query checks:

const prefersReducedMotion = window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)').matches;

3. Keyboard Navigation

• Interactive elements in animations may not be keyboard accessible
• No visible focus indicators mentioned

4. Color Contrast (Potential)

• text-zinc-400 on bg-black may not meet WCAG AA standards
• Should verify with a contrast checker

📋 Recommendations

High Priority

1. ✅ Fix missing trailing newline in CodeWalkthrough.tsx
2. 🔴 Define missing animation keyframes or remove references
3. 🟡 Replace array indices with stable keys in mapped components
4. 🟡 Add prefers-reduced-motion support

Medium Priority
5. Consider memoizing expensive computations (syntax highlighting)
6. Improve semantic HTML structure
7. Add ARIA labels for animations/graphics
8. Verify color contrast ratios

Low Priority
9. Optimize IntersectionObserver usage
10. Add unit tests for animation logic
11. Document custom animation keyframes

📝 Code Style Notes

The code generally follows good React/TypeScript practices. The animation-heavy nature is appropriate for a marketing page, though the missing keyframe definitions need to be addressed before deployment.

---

Overall Assessment: This is a solid redesign with good code quality. The main blockers are the missing animation definitions and accessibility improvements. Once the keyframes are defined and motion preferences are respected, this should be ready to merge.

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Redesign

Thanks for this comprehensive website redesign! I've reviewed the changes and have the following feedback:

✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Component Architecture: The new section components (CodeWalkthrough, ConceptSection, etc.) are well-structured and self-contained.

2. Strong Visual Design: The animations using Framer Motion are smooth and the visual hierarchy is clear with consistent use of gradients, borders, and opacity.

3. Good Responsive Considerations: Mobile-specific code snippets in CodeWalkthrough and responsive grid layouts show attention to different screen sizes.

4. Reusable Components: The new FadeIn components provide a clean API for animations with good defaults.

---

🐛 Bugs & Issues

1. Memory Leak in CodeWalkthrough (High Priority)

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82

const observerRefs = useRef([]);

Issue: The observerRefs is initialized as an empty array but is mutated directly via observerRefs.current[idx] = el. This can cause:

• Type safety issues (TypeScript won't catch incorrect usage)
• Potential memory leaks if the array grows indefinitely

Fix: Use proper typing:

const observerRefs = useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([]);

2. Missing Cleanup Dependencies

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/CodeWalkthrough.tsx:82

The useEffect cleanup function doesn't depend on the observer refs, which could cause issues if the component updates.

Recommendation: Add proper dependency array or use a callback pattern to ensure refs are properly cleaned up.

3. Animation State Management

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/ConceptSection.tsx:10-15

The interval in ArchitectureComparison continues running even after the component unmounts or if the user navigates away.

Current Code:

useEffect(() => {
    const interval = setInterval(() => {
        setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
    }, 2000);
    return () => clearInterval(interval);
}, []);

While cleanup is present, consider adding pause-on-hover or visibility detection to improve performance and UX.

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Animation Performance

• CodeWalkthrough applies blur effects (blur-[1px]) to multiple elements. Blur is expensive and can cause jank on lower-end devices.
• Recommendation: Consider using opacity transitions only, or use will-change: filter CSS property sparingly on elements that will animate.

2. Excessive Re-renders

In CodeWalkthrough, the entire code block re-renders on every scroll event that triggers intersection changes. Consider:

• Memoizing the code line rendering
• Using React.memo for the individual step components
• Debouncing the intersection observer callback

Example optimization:

const CodeLine = React.memo(({ line, idx, isHighlighted }) => {
    // ... render logic
});

3. Large Bundle Size Concerns

Multiple new page components (agents, collaborative-state, games, workflows, etc.) each ~700 lines. Ensure these are properly code-split and lazy-loaded:

const AgentsPage = lazy(() => import('./solutions/agents/page'));

---

🔒 Security Concerns

1. No User Input Validation

If any of these components will eventually accept user input or dynamic content, ensure proper sanitization is in place.

2. External Animation Library

Framer Motion is a legitimate library, but verify the version and ensure it is up to date for any security patches.

---

🧪 Test Coverage

Missing Tests: This PR adds 6,180 lines of code but no test files are visible. Consider adding:

1. Component Tests: Unit tests for each section component
2. Interaction Tests: Test the IntersectionObserver behavior in CodeWalkthrough
3. Animation Tests: Verify that animations complete correctly
4. Accessibility Tests: Ensure keyboard navigation and screen readers work properly

Example test structure:

describe('CodeWalkthrough', () => {
    it('should update active step on scroll', () => {
        // Test intersection observer behavior
    });
    
    it('should highlight correct code lines for each step', () => {
        // Verify highlighting logic
    });
});

---

📝 Code Quality Suggestions

1. Extract Magic Numbers

// Before
rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px",

// After
const SCROLL_ACTIVATION_MARGIN = '-40% 0px -40% 0px';
rootMargin: SCROLL_ACTIVATION_MARGIN,

2. Add JSDoc Comments

Complex components like CodeWalkthrough would benefit from documentation:

/**
 * Interactive code walkthrough component that highlights different
 * code sections as the user scrolls through explanatory steps.
 * 
 * Uses IntersectionObserver to detect which step is currently visible.
 */
export const CodeWalkthrough = () => {

3. Type Safety Improvements

Several places use inline types or implicit any. Define proper interfaces:

interface WalkthroughStep {
    title: string;
    description: string;
    lines: number[];
}

interface FeatureCardProps {
    title: string;
    description: string;
    code?: string;
    graphic: React.ReactNode;
}

4. Accessibility Improvements

• Add aria-label attributes to animated graphics
• Ensure contrast ratios meet WCAG AA standards (some zinc-500 text may be too dim)
• Add prefers-reduced-motion media query support:

const prefersReducedMotion = window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)').matches;

const transition = prefersReducedMotion 
    ? { duration: 0 } 
    : { duration: 0.5 };

---

📋 Summary

This is a high-quality website redesign with excellent visual design and component structure. The main areas for improvement are:

1. Fix the ref typing issue in CodeWalkthrough (critical)
2. Add test coverage for the new components
3. Optimize animation performance by reducing blur usage and memoizing renders
4. Improve accessibility with ARIA labels and reduced-motion support
5. Consider code splitting for the large solution pages

The code follows good React patterns overall and the Framer Motion integration is well-executed. Great work on the visual design! 🎉

---

Next Steps:

• Address the memory leak in observerRefs
• Add unit tests for critical components
• Run Lighthouse audit to check performance metrics
• Test on mobile devices for animation smoothness

[claude]

Code Review: v5 Website Changes

Overview

This PR introduces a comprehensive redesign of the Rivet website homepage and adds several new solution pages. The changes total 6,235 additions and 240 deletions across 22 files, primarily focused on TypeScript/React components.

---

✅ Strengths

1. Well-Structured Component Architecture

   • Clean separation of concerns with individual section components
   • Consistent naming conventions (e.g., RedesignedHero, CodeWalkthrough, ConceptSection)
   • Good use of modern React patterns with hooks and Framer Motion animations

2. Visual Design & UX

   • Sophisticated animations and transitions using Framer Motion
   • Consistent design system with gradients, borders, and hover effects
   • Responsive design considerations (mobile, tablet, desktop breakpoints)
   • Accessibility-friendly scroll observers and viewport triggers

3. Code Reusability

   • Shared FadeIn component for consistent animation patterns
   • Reusable CodeBlock component with syntax highlighting
   • Shared Badge component across solution pages

---

⚠️ Issues & Recommendations

1. Performance Concerns

Issue: Multiple large components with heavy animations could impact page load and runtime performance.

// In CodeWalkthrough.tsx and similar files
const codeLines = [/* 15+ lines */];
// Each line is being processed through complex tokenization on every render

Recommendation:

• Consider memoizing the tokenized code output with useMemo() to avoid re-processing on every render
• Lazy load solution pages that aren't immediately visible
• Consider code-splitting for heavy Framer Motion animations

Example:

const tokenizedLines = useMemo(() => {
  return codeLines.map(line => tokenizeLine(line));
}, [codeLines]);

2. Duplicate Code Patterns

Issue: The custom tokenizer logic appears in multiple files with slight variations:

• website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/RedesignedHero.tsx:26-77
• website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/solutions/agents/page.tsx:73-134

Recommendation: Extract this into a shared utility function or custom hook:

// utils/codeTokenizer.ts
export function tokenizeLine(line: string): JSX.Element[] {
  // Centralized tokenization logic
}

3. Hardcoded Values & Magic Numbers

Issue: Many hardcoded values throughout the components:

viewport={{ once: true, margin: "-50px" }}
rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px"

Recommendation: Define these as named constants at the file or module level:

const VIEWPORT_CONFIG = {
  once: true,
  margin: "-50px"
};

const SCROLL_OBSERVER_MARGIN = "-40% 0px -40% 0px";

4. Accessibility Gaps

Issue: Several interactive elements lack proper ARIA labels:

// CodeWalkthrough.tsx:line 11-13
<div className="w-3 h-3 rounded-full bg-zinc-500/20 border border-zinc-500/50" />

Recommendation: Add semantic HTML and ARIA attributes:

<div 
  role="presentation" 
  aria-label="Window controls"
  className="flex gap-1.5"
>
  {/* Window control buttons */}
</div>

5. Missing Error Boundaries

Issue: No error boundaries around the complex animated sections. If an animation fails, it could crash the entire page.

Recommendation: Wrap major sections in React error boundaries:

<ErrorBoundary fallback={<SimpleHero />}>
  <RedesignedHero />
</ErrorBoundary>

6. Type Safety

Issue: Some components have loose typing:

// FadeIn.tsx
const CodeBlock = ({ code, fileName = "actor.ts" }) => {
  // Missing explicit types for props
}

Recommendation: Add explicit TypeScript interfaces:

interface CodeBlockProps {
  code: string;
  fileName?: string;
}

const CodeBlock = ({ code, fileName = "actor.ts" }: CodeBlockProps) => {
  // ...
}

7. Potential Memory Leaks

Issue: In CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-81, the IntersectionObserver setup doesn't properly handle cleanup if refs change:

Recommendation: Ensure proper cleanup:

useEffect(() => {
  const currentRefs = observerRefs.current.filter(Boolean);
  
  currentRefs.forEach((ref) => {
    if (ref) observer.observe(ref);
  });

  return () => {
    currentRefs.forEach((ref) => {
      if (ref) observer.unobserve(ref);
    });
  };
}, []); // Add proper dependencies

8. Package Dependencies

Issue: Added @vbare/compiler and @biomejs/biome to dependencies without explanation in PR description.

Questions:

• Is @vbare/compiler actually used in the website code? (Grep didn't find usage)
• Is @biomejs/biome replacing an existing formatter/linter?

Recommendation: Document why these dependencies were added or remove if unused.

---

🔒 Security Review

✅ No major security concerns identified

• No user input handling in the changed code
• No external API calls or data fetching
• Static content rendering only

---

🧪 Test Coverage

⚠️ Missing Tests

This PR adds ~6,000 lines of new code but no tests.

Recommendation:

• Add snapshot tests for major components to catch unintended visual regressions
• Add unit tests for the animation logic and scroll observers
• Add integration tests for navigation flows

Example:

// CodeWalkthrough.test.tsx
describe('CodeWalkthrough', () => {
  it('highlights the correct step on scroll', () => {
    // Test scroll observer logic
  });
  
  it('renders all code lines correctly', () => {
    // Snapshot test
  });
});

---

📋 Additional Notes

1. Documentation: Consider adding comments explaining the complex animation sequences and observer logic
2. Bundle Size: Run a bundle analyzer to ensure these changes don't significantly increase the page weight
3. Browser Compatibility: Test the animations and gradients in older browsers
4. Mobile Performance: Specifically test on lower-end mobile devices given the animation complexity

---

✨ Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality visual redesign with modern React patterns and thoughtful UX. The main areas for improvement are:

• Performance optimization (memoization, lazy loading)
• Code deduplication
• Test coverage
• TypeScript strictness

Recommendation: Address performance and accessibility concerns before merging, and add basic test coverage for the core interactive components.

Great work on the visual design and component structure! 🚀

[pkg-pr-new]

More templates

• example-ai-agent
• example-background-jobs
• example-better-auth-external-db
• example-bots
• chat-room
• example-cloudflare-workers
• example-cloudflare-workers-hono
• example-counter
• example-counter-serverless
• example-crdt
• example-cursors
• example-cursors-raw-websocket
• example-database
• example-deno
• example-sqlite
• example-elysia
• example-express
• example-freestyle
• example-game
• example-hono
• example-hono-bun
• example-hono-react
• example-kitchen-sink
• example-next-js
• example-rate
• example-raw-fetch-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler-proxy
• example-react
• starter
• example-stream
• example-sync
• example-tenant
• example-trpc
• example-workflows

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3486

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3486

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3486

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3486

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3486

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3486

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3486

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3486

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3486

commit: 30377cb

[claude]

This is a well-executed UI redesign with modern React patterns and good component structure. I have conducted a comprehensive review covering code quality, potential bugs, performance, security, and test coverage.

Summary

This PR introduces a comprehensive redesign of the Rivet marketing website with new sections, improved visual design, and better code organization. The changes add approximately 6,200 lines.

Code Quality - Strengths ✅

1. Well-structured components - each section properly isolated
2. Consistent modern React patterns (hooks, effects, refs)
3. Good separation of concerns
4. Responsive design with proper breakpoints
5. Strong TypeScript usage where defined

Issues & Recommendations ⚠️

1. Missing TypeScript types

Location: CodeWalkthrough.tsx:8
Issue: const observerRefs = useRef([]); is not typed
Fix: const observerRefs = useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([]);

2. Accessibility gaps

• Buttons missing aria-label attributes (RedesignedHero.tsx:135-142)
• Interactive steps lack keyboard navigation (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:177-214)
• Need tabIndex and onKeyDown handlers

3. Performance issues

• Regex recreated on every render (RedesignedHero.tsx:41)
• Syntax highlighting not memoized
• Consider lazy loading below-fold sections

4. Code quality

• Unused imports (Check icon in ConceptSection.tsx:4)
• Magic numbers not extracted to constants
• Inconsistent animation timings across components

5. Potential race condition

IntersectionObserver callback could setState on unmounted component (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82)
Add mounted ref check for safety.

Test Coverage ❌

6,235 lines added with NO test files. Recommend:

• Snapshot tests for visual regression prevention
• Interaction tests for IntersectionObserver
• Animation tests for auto-advancing behavior
• Accessibility tests with jest-axe

Security 🔒

No vulnerabilities identified - purely presentational code.

Dependencies 📦

• @biomejs/biome added but not used in this PR
• @vbare/compiler added to engine (unclear why needed for website)
• Consider splitting dependency updates to separate PR

Recommended Actions Before Merge

• Fix TypeScript types on refs
• Add basic accessibility attributes
• Remove unused imports
• Add at least basic smoke tests
• Extract magic numbers to constants
• Memoize expensive render computations

Overall Assessment

Approve with suggestions ✅

The redesign is polished and maintainable. Address the TypeScript types, accessibility, and consider adding tests before merging. Great work on the visual improvements!

[claude]

PR Review: Website V5 Redesign

Overview

This is a substantial website redesign with 6,235 additions across 22 files, introducing new marketing sections, solution pages, and improved visual components. The code is generally well-structured with modern React patterns.

---

✅ Strengths

Code Quality

• Clean Component Structure: Well-organized sections with clear separation of concerns
• Consistent Naming: Components follow clear naming conventions (e.g., RedesignedHero, CodeWalkthrough)
• Modern React Patterns: Proper use of hooks, functional components, and TypeScript
• Accessibility: Good use of semantic HTML and ARIA-friendly structures

Design Implementation

• Smooth Animations: Excellent use of Framer Motion with proper viewport detection
• Responsive Design: Mobile-first approach with proper breakpoints
• Visual Polish: Sophisticated blur effects, gradients, and transitions

---

⚠️ Issues & Recommendations

1. Memory Leak Risk in CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82

Severity: Medium

The IntersectionObserver cleanup doesn't account for ref array changes:

useEffect(() => {
  // ...observer setup
  observerRefs.current.forEach((ref) => {
    if (ref) observer.observe(ref);
  });
  
  return () => observer.disconnect();
}, []); // ⚠️ Empty dependency array

Problem: If observerRefs changes (which it can during render), the cleanup won't properly disconnect old observers.

Recommendation:

useEffect(() => {
  const options = {
    root: null,
    rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px",
    threshold: 0,
  };

  const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries) => {
    entries.forEach((entry) => {
      if (entry.isIntersecting) {
        const index = Number(entry.target.dataset.index);
        setActiveStep(index);
      }
    });
  }, options);

  const refs = observerRefs.current.filter(Boolean);
  refs.forEach((ref) => observer.observe(ref));

  return () => {
    refs.forEach((ref) => observer.unobserve(ref));
    observer.disconnect();
  };
}, [steps.length]); // Add dependency

2. Missing TypeScript Types

Severity: Low-Medium

Several components lack proper TypeScript interfaces:

CodeWalkthrough.tsx:8

const observerRefs = useRef([]); // ⚠️ Should be typed

Recommendation:

const observerRefs = useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([]);

ConceptSection.tsx:7 & RedesignedHero.tsx:6
Missing prop types for CodeBlock component:

interface CodeBlockProps {
  code: string;
  fileName?: string;
}

const CodeBlock = ({ code, fileName = "actor.ts" }: CodeBlockProps) => {
  // ...
}

3. Performance: Inline Regex & Array Operations

Severity: Low

CodeWalkthrough.tsx:134 & RedesignedHero.tsx (multiple instances)

String tokenization happens on every render:

{line.split(/(\s+)/).map((part, i) => {
  // Complex parsing logic
})}

Recommendation: Memoize the parsed code:

const parsedCode = useMemo(() => {
  return codeLines.map(line => {
    // Parse logic here
  });
}, [codeLines]);

4. Accessibility: Missing ARIA Labels

Severity: Low

Interactive elements should have proper labels:

RedesignedHero.tsx:135-142

<button className="...">
  Start Building
  <ArrowRight className="w-4 h-4" />
</button>

Recommendation: Add aria-label attributes where button text isn't descriptive enough, especially for icon-only buttons if any exist.

5. ConceptSection.tsx:11-15 - Interval Cleanup

Severity: Low

The interval is cleaned up correctly, but could be paused when not visible:

useEffect(() => {
  const interval = setInterval(() => {
    setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
  }, 2000);
  return () => clearInterval(interval);
}, []);

Recommendation: Consider pausing animation when component is not in viewport to save CPU:

const [isVisible, setIsVisible] = useState(false);

useEffect(() => {
  if (!isVisible) return;
  
  const interval = setInterval(() => {
    setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
  }, 2000);
  return () => clearInterval(interval);
}, [isVisible]);

6. Code Duplication

Severity: Low

The CodeBlock component is duplicated across multiple files (RedesignedHero.tsx, solution pages).

Recommendation: Extract to a shared component:

website/src/components/CodeBlock.tsx

7. Hard-coded Colors

Severity: Low

The color #FF4500 (Rivet orange) appears throughout but isn't in Tailwind config:

Recommendation: Add to tailwind.config.js:

theme: {
  extend: {
    colors: {
      'rivet-orange': '#FF4500',
    }
  }
}

Then use: text-rivet-orange instead of text-[#FF4500]

---

🔒 Security Considerations

✅ No major security concerns detected

• No user input handling
• No external data fetching
• No dangerous HTML rendering
• Static content only

---

🧪 Test Coverage

⚠️ No tests included in this PR

Recommendation: Add visual regression tests or component tests for:

1. Animation states in CodeWalkthrough
2. Responsive breakpoints
3. Intersection observer behavior

Consider using:

• Playwright for E2E visual testing
• React Testing Library for component behavior

---

📊 Performance Notes

Bundle Size Impact

• Adding 6,235 lines will increase bundle size
• Framer Motion is already a dependency (good)
• Multiple large solution pages (~700 lines each)

Recommendation: Consider code-splitting solution pages:

const AgentsPage = dynamic(() => import('./solutions/agents/page'), {
  loading: () => <LoadingSpinner />
});

Runtime Performance

• Multiple IntersectionObserver instances could impact mobile devices
• Consider using a single observer with multiple elements

---

📝 Minor Nits

1. Inconsistent line endings in CodeWalkthrough.tsx:223-224 (extra blank line)
2. Unused imports: Check for Check icon import in ConceptSection.tsx:4 (imported but not used)
3. Magic numbers: rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px" should be a named constant

---

✨ Overall Assessment

Quality: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)
Security: ✅ No concerns
Performance: ⚠️ Minor optimizations recommended
Maintainability: ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (4/5)

This is solid work with modern React patterns and good visual design. The main issues are minor: missing type safety, potential memory leaks in observers, and opportunities for performance optimization. None are blockers, but addressing them will improve code quality.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with suggestions - Safe to merge after addressing the IntersectionObserver cleanup issue.

---

🚀 Nice Touches

• Smooth scroll-based animations with Framer Motion
• Responsive mobile code snippets
• Elegant syntax highlighting implementation
• Professional visual polish with backdrop blur and gradients

Great work on the redesign! 🎉

[claude]

PR Review: Website v5 Changes

This PR introduces significant visual and content redesigns to the marketing website. Here's my comprehensive review:

✅ Strengths

1. Consistent Design System: Great use of reusable design patterns with shine highlights, backdrop blur, and consistent border styling across components.

2. Good Component Structure: The new sections are well-organized with clear separation of concerns (Hero, Features, Code Walkthrough, etc.).

3. Interactive Elements: The CodeWalkthrough section with scroll-based highlighting is a nice touch for user engagement.

4. Accessibility: Motion components use framer-motion with viewport={{ once: true }} which is good for performance and accessibility.

🔍 Code Quality Issues

1. Missing Type Definitions (Critical):

   • CodeBlock component in RedesignedHero.tsx lacks proper TypeScript prop types
   • Badge component in agent/page.tsx uses inline types instead of interface
   • Consider creating shared type definitions for reusable components

2. Inline Styles (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:84):

   <section className="py-32 bg-black relative border-t border-white/10">

   Prefer using Tailwind's utility classes consistently. However, this is acceptable if part of the design system.

3. Complex Tokenizer Logic (RedesignedHero.tsx:26-76):

   • The custom syntax highlighting tokenizer is quite complex and could be extracted to a utility function
   • Consider using a proper syntax highlighting library like prism-react-renderer or react-syntax-highlighter for maintainability
   • Current implementation may have edge cases with escaped quotes or regex patterns

4. Magic Numbers (ConceptSection.tsx:12):

   const interval = setInterval(() => {
     setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
   }, 2000);

   Extract 2000 and 4 as named constants: ANIMATION_INTERVAL and TOTAL_STEPS

5. Ref Array Management (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:43):

   observerRefs.current.forEach((ref) => {
     if (ref) observer.observe(ref);
   });

   This pattern works but could lead to memory leaks if refs aren't properly cleaned up. Consider using a cleanup function.

⚠️ Potential Bugs

1. Copy Functionality (agent/page.tsx:65-79):

   • Using document.execCommand('copy') is deprecated
   • Fallback to navigator.clipboard is good, but the implementation has error handling that swallows errors silently
   • Recommend: Use navigator.clipboard.writeText() as primary method with proper error handling

2. Animation Memory Leak Risk (ConceptSection.tsx:10-13):

   • The interval is cleared in useEffect cleanup, which is correct
   • However, state updates after component unmount could still occur if there's a timing issue

3. IntersectionObserver Cleanup (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:80):

   • Good use of cleanup, but ensure refs array doesn't change during component lifecycle
   • Consider using a callback ref pattern instead

🎯 Best Practices Violations

1. Component Size: Several components exceed 200 lines (agent/page.tsx is 747 lines). Consider breaking into smaller, reusable components.

2. Hardcoded Content: Large amounts of content are hardcoded in JSX. Consider:

   • Moving to content files (JSON/MDX)
   • Using a CMS for easier updates
   • Creating content constants at the top of files

3. Color Values: Using hex colors directly (#FF4500, #0A0A0A) instead of Tailwind theme colors. Consider adding these to tailwind.config.js:

   colors: {
     brand: {
       orange: '#FF4500',
       // ...
     }
   }

4. Missing Comments: Complex animation logic and intersection observer setup lack inline comments explaining the "why" behind timing values and thresholds.

🔒 Security

• ✅ No security concerns identified
• ✅ No user input is rendered unsafely
• ✅ No direct DOM manipulation beyond copy functionality

🚀 Performance Considerations

1. Animation Performance: Using backdrop-blur extensively may impact performance on lower-end devices. Consider:

   • Adding a @media (prefers-reduced-motion) query
   • Testing on mobile devices

2. Bundle Size: Check if framer-motion is tree-shaken properly. The PR adds significant JS weight with animations.

3. Large Files: New pages like agent/page.tsx (747 lines) and solutions/* pages add substantial bundle size. Consider:

   • Code splitting with dynamic imports
   • Lazy loading sections below the fold

📝 Missing Elements

1. No Tests: This is a large UI change with zero test coverage

   • Consider adding:
     • Visual regression tests (Chromatic/Percy)
     • Accessibility tests with @testing-library/react
     • Unit tests for interactive components (CodeWalkthrough, ConceptSection)

2. No Documentation:

   • Add comments for complex animation logic
   • Document the design system patterns
   • Add a README for the new components

3. No Accessibility Audit:

   • Run axe-core or similar tools
   • Verify keyboard navigation works
   • Check color contrast ratios (especially text-zinc-400 on dark backgrounds)

🔧 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Add proper TypeScript types to all new components
2. Replace deprecated document.execCommand with modern clipboard API
3. Extract the syntax highlighter to a utility or use a library
4. Add basic accessibility tests

Medium Priority:

1. Break large components into smaller, reusable pieces
2. Extract magic numbers to named constants
3. Move hardcoded content to separate files
4. Add design system colors to Tailwind config

Low Priority:

1. Add inline comments for complex logic
2. Consider performance optimizations for animations
3. Add visual regression tests
4. Document component patterns

📊 Metrics

• Lines Changed: +6239, -244
• Files Changed: 23
• Test Coverage: ❌ None added
• Type Safety: ⚠️ Could be improved

✅ Approval Status

This is a significant improvement to the website's visual design and user experience. While there are code quality improvements to be made, none are blocking. I recommend:

• ✅ Approve and merge if this is time-sensitive for a launch
• Request changes if there's time to address TypeScript types and deprecated APIs

The visual design is excellent, and the code is generally well-structured. The main concerns are around maintainability and type safety, which can be addressed in follow-up PRs if needed.

---

Great work on the redesign! 🎉 The new sections look polished and the actor model visualization is particularly effective.

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Changes

This PR introduces a major redesign of the marketing website with new sections and solution pages. Here's my comprehensive review:

🎨 Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

• Clean component organization with focused, single-purpose components
• Good use of Framer Motion for animations
• Consistent naming conventions across files
• Proper TypeScript usage with type annotations

Issues:

1. Blog Post Date Issue (website/src/posts/2025-10-20-how-we-built-websocket-servers-for-vercel-functions/page.mdx:19)

   • Published date is set to 2025-10-20 (October 2025 in the future)
   • According to CLAUDE.md env, today is 2025-11-20, so this should likely be 2024-10-20 or the actual publication date
   • This could cause sorting/filtering issues

2. Hardcoded Colors & Magic Numbers

   • Multiple instances of hardcoded hex colors like #FF4500, #0A0A0A
   • Consider extracting these to a design tokens/constants file for consistency
   • Example: CodeWalkthrough.tsx:60, RedesignedHero.tsx:101

3. Inline Anonymous Functions in JSX (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:20-77, RedesignedHero.tsx:20-80)

   • Complex tokenization logic embedded directly in JSX render
   • Should be extracted to separate utility functions for testability and maintainability

   // Instead of inline logic, extract to:
   const tokenizeLine = (line: string) => { /* ... */ }

4. Large Component Files

   • Some solution pages are 700+ lines (solutions/agents/page.tsx, solutions/games/page.tsx)
   • Consider breaking into smaller sub-components
   • Reusable components like Badge are duplicated across files instead of being shared

5. Missing Error Boundaries

   • No error boundaries visible for client components
   • Animation-heavy components should have graceful fallbacks

🐛 Potential Bugs

1. Intersection Observer Memory Leak (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:60-80)

   • observerRefs.current array may contain null entries
   • Filter before observing: observerRefs.current.filter(Boolean).forEach(...)

2. Animation Timing Conflicts

   • Multiple components use similar timing intervals (2s, 3s) for animations
   • Could cause performance issues with many concurrent animations
   • Consider using CSS animations or shared animation contexts

3. Accessibility Concerns

   • Several interactive elements lack proper ARIA labels
   • <span className="w-2 h-2 rounded-full bg-[#FF4500] animate-pulse" /> should have aria-hidden="true"
   • Code blocks should have role="region" and aria-label

4. Mobile Responsiveness

   • CodeWalkthrough sticky positioning may not work well on iOS Safari
   • top-32 might cause issues with different mobile browser chrome heights
   • Consider using position: sticky with position: -webkit-sticky fallback

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Bundle Size Impact

   • Added 6,250 lines of code (+6,250, -255)
   • Framer Motion is used heavily - ensure tree-shaking is working
   • Consider lazy loading solution pages since they're 700+ lines each

2. Animation Performance

   • Multiple animate-pulse, animate-ping on same page
   • Use will-change: transform carefully - currently missing
   • Consider using CSS contain: layout for animated sections

3. Intersection Observer Overhead

   • Multiple observers created in same component (CodeWalkthrough.tsx)
   • Consider using a shared observer with a callback map

4. Image Optimization

   • No images visible in diff, but ensure Next.js Image component is used
   • Check if solution page graphics should be using Image component

5. Font Loading

   • Multiple font families referenced (font-mono, font-sans)
   • Ensure fonts are preloaded and use font-display: swap

🔒 Security Concerns

1. XSS Risk in Code Tokenizer (RedesignedHero.tsx:20-80)

   • Code tokenization creates JSX elements from arbitrary strings
   • While controlled content here, ensure no user input can reach this
   • Current implementation looks safe but lacks explicit sanitization

2. External Link Security

   • Ensure external links include rel="noopener noreferrer"
   • Check if GitHubDropdown (Header.tsx:14) properly sanitizes links

3. Dependency Audit

   • @vbare/compiler added as new dependency (pnpm-lock.yaml)
   • @biomejs/biome added but not documented in CLAUDE.md
   • Run pnpm audit to check for vulnerabilities

🧪 Test Coverage

Critical Gaps:

• No tests visible for any new components
• Animation-heavy components like CodeWalkthrough need:
  • Intersection Observer mock tests
  • Animation state tests
  • Responsive behavior tests
• Solution pages need:
  • Rendering tests
  • Navigation tests
  • Accessibility tests

Recommendations:

// Add tests for critical paths
describe('CodeWalkthrough', () => {
  it('should update active step on scroll', () => { /* ... */ });
  it('should clean up observer on unmount', () => { /* ... */ });
  it('should highlight correct code lines', () => { /* ... */ });
});

📝 Code Style & Conventions

Per CLAUDE.md:

• ✅ Using TypeScript
• ✅ Using pnpm
• ⚠️ No explicit formatting issues (but CLAUDE.md says don't run formatters)
• ⚠️ Component duplication (Badge, CodeBlock patterns repeated)

Suggestions:

1. Extract shared components to website/src/components/v2/ directory
2. Create a design system constants file for colors/spacing
3. Add JSDoc comments to complex utility functions
4. Consider using a shared animation variants object

🎯 Specific File Feedback

CodeWalkthrough.tsx:

• Line 35-40: Magic string comments should be constants
• Line 66-78: Extract observer logic to custom hook useScrollSpy
• Line 117-163: Consider using syntax highlighter library instead of manual tokenization

FeaturesSection.tsx:

• Excellent use of visual metaphors
• Consider extracting graphic components to separate files
• Animation keyframes should be in global CSS or Tailwind config

RedesignedHero.tsx:

• Clean structure
• CodeBlock component should be extracted to shared components
• Consider adding loading states for animations

Solution Pages (agents, games, etc.):

• High duplication - create a shared template/layout
• 700+ lines is too large - break into 5-6 smaller components
• Badge component duplicated - move to shared components

✅ What's Good

• Clean, modern design language
• Good use of TypeScript
• Consistent component structure
• Proper use of Next.js client components
• Good separation of concerns in most places
• Framer Motion animations are smooth and purposeful

🚀 Recommendations

High Priority:

1. Fix blog post date from 2025 to 2024
2. Add error boundaries to client components
3. Extract shared components (Badge, CodeBlock)
4. Fix Intersection Observer memory leak
5. Add accessibility attributes

Medium Priority:

1. Break up large solution pages into smaller components
2. Extract color constants to design tokens
3. Add basic unit tests for critical components
4. Optimize animation performance
5. Add missing TypeScript types where inferred

Low Priority:

1. Add JSDoc comments to complex functions
2. Consider using a proper syntax highlighting library
3. Set up component documentation (Storybook?)
4. Add E2E tests for critical user flows
5. Performance audit with Lighthouse

📊 Impact Assessment

Positive:

• Major UX improvement with modern design
• Better content organization with solution pages
• Improved visual communication of concepts

Risks:

• Large bundle size increase
• No test coverage for new code
• Potential performance issues with animations
• Blog post date bug could affect SEO

Overall, this is a solid visual redesign with clean code structure. The main concerns are the lack of tests, some performance considerations, and the blog post date bug. Address the high-priority items before merging.

Recommendation: Approve with changes requested - fix the date bug and add error boundaries, then this is good to merge.

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Changes

Summary

This PR introduces a comprehensive redesign of the marketing website with new sections and components. Overall, the code quality is good with modern React patterns and nice animations. However, there are several issues that should be addressed before merging.

---

🐛 Critical Issues

1. TypeScript Type Error in CodeWalkthrough.tsx

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/CodeWalkthrough.tsx:8

const observerRefs = useRef([]);

Problem: The useRef is not typed, which will cause TypeScript errors. The array is being assigned HTMLDivElement references but TypeScript doesn't know this.

Fix:

const observerRefs = useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([]);

Why this matters: Without proper typing, TypeScript can't catch errors when accessing array elements, and it violates the project's type safety standards.

---

2. Memory Leak in ConceptSection.tsx

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/ConceptSection.tsx:10-15

useEffect(() => {
  const interval = setInterval(() => {
    setActiveStep((prev) => (prev + 1) % 4);
  }, 2000);
  return () => clearInterval(interval);
}, []);

Problem: While the cleanup is present, there's no check for whether the component is still mounted. In React 18's Strict Mode (development), effects run twice, which could cause unexpected behavior.

Recommendation: This is actually handled correctly with the cleanup function. No change needed, but good to be aware of.

---

3. Unused Import in ConceptSection.tsx

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/ConceptSection.tsx:4

import { Server, Box, Database, Cpu, Check } from "lucide-react";

Problem: The Check icon is imported but never used in the component.

Fix: Remove the unused import:

import { Server, Box, Database, Cpu } from "lucide-react";

---

⚠️ Code Quality Issues

4. Inconsistent Animation Timing

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82

The IntersectionObserver is configured with hardcoded values:

rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px",

Recommendation: Consider extracting these magic numbers into named constants at the top of the file for better maintainability:

const OBSERVER_ROOT_MARGIN = "-40% 0px -40% 0px";
const OBSERVER_THRESHOLD = 0;

---

5. Missing Error Boundaries

The new sections contain complex animations and interactive elements but don't appear to have error boundaries. If any animation fails or the IntersectionObserver API is not available, the entire page could break.

Recommendation: Consider wrapping the main sections in an error boundary component, especially for the CodeWalkthrough and ConceptSection which have more complex state management.

---

6. Accessibility Issues

a) Missing aria-labels on interactive buttons

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/RedesignedHero.tsx:135-142

The buttons lack proper accessibility attributes:

<button className="font-v2 subpixel-antialiased inline-flex items-center...">
  Start Building
  <ArrowRight className="w-4 h-4" />
</button>

Fix: Add aria-label attributes:

<button 
  aria-label="Start building with Rivet"
  className="font-v2 subpixel-antialiased inline-flex items-center..."
>
  Start Building
  <ArrowRight className="w-4 h-4" aria-hidden="true" />
</button>

b) Decorative icons not hidden from screen readers

All the lucide-react icons used decoratively should have aria-hidden="true".

---

7. Performance Concerns

a) Large inline styles in FeaturesSection.tsx

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/FeaturesSection.tsx:281-362

There's an 80+ line <style> tag with inline CSS. This will be recreated on every render.

Recommendation: Move these animations to a separate CSS module or global stylesheet to prevent re-parsing on each render.

b) Complex tokenizer in RedesignedHero.tsx

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/RedesignedHero.tsx:27-77

The custom tokenizer runs inside the render method:

{code.split("\n").map((line, i) => (
  // ... complex tokenization logic ...
))}

Recommendation: Memoize the tokenized code or compute it outside the render function:

const tokenizedCode = useMemo(() => {
  return code.split("\n").map(line => {
    // tokenization logic
  });
}, [code]);

---

📝 Best Practices

8. Magic Numbers in CodeWalkthrough

Location: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/sections/CodeWalkthrough.tsx:216

<div className="h-[20vh]" />

Recommendation: Extract this to a named constant or comment why this specific height is needed (likely for scroll triggering).

---

9. Hardcoded Colors

There are many hardcoded color values like #FF4500, #0A0A0A throughout the components. While this is acceptable for a marketing page, consider extracting these to theme constants for easier maintenance.

Example:

const THEME = {
  brand: '#FF4500',
  bg: '#0A0A0A',
  // ...
} as const;

---

10. Dependency Concerns

Location: pnpm-lock.yaml

The PR adds @vbare/compiler and @biomejs/biome dependencies.

Questions:

• Are these intentionally added or leftover from development?
• If they're needed, they should be documented in the commit message
• If not needed, they should be removed

---

✅ Positive Observations

1. Good use of Framer Motion - Animations are well-implemented and performant
2. Responsive design - Mobile-first approach with proper breakpoints
3. Consistent naming - Component and variable naming follows good conventions
4. Clean component structure - Each section is properly isolated
5. Good visual polish - Attention to detail with shine effects, gradients, and micro-interactions

---

🔒 Security Review

No security concerns identified. All user-facing content is static, and there's no dynamic data rendering or XSS vectors.

---

🧪 Testing Recommendations

1. Test in React Strict Mode - Ensure all useEffect cleanup functions work correctly
2. Browser compatibility - Test IntersectionObserver fallbacks for older browsers
3. Performance testing - Run Lighthouse to ensure the animations don't impact Core Web Vitals
4. Accessibility audit - Use axe-core or similar tools to catch accessibility issues
5. Mobile testing - Verify animations perform well on lower-end mobile devices

---

Summary of Required Changes

Must fix before merge:

1. ✅ Add TypeScript type for observerRefs in CodeWalkthrough.tsx
2. ✅ Remove unused Check import in ConceptSection.tsx
3. ✅ Add accessibility attributes to interactive elements

Recommended improvements:

1. Memoize complex computations in RedesignedHero.tsx
2. Move inline styles to separate stylesheet
3. Add error boundaries
4. Document or remove new dependencies

Nice to have:

1. Extract magic numbers to constants
2. Extract colors to theme constants
3. Add browser compatibility tests

---

Overall, this is a solid redesign with good attention to visual detail. The issues found are mostly minor and easily fixable. Great work! 🎉

[claude]

PR Review: V5 Website Redesign

Thank you for this comprehensive website redesign! This is a substantial frontend update with 6,252 additions. Here's my detailed review:

---

✅ Positives

Strong Design & UX

• Excellent interactive components: The CodeWalkthrough component with IntersectionObserver creates an engaging scroll-based code tutorial
• Consistent design system: Good use of shared components like Badge, CodeBlock with unified styling patterns
• Responsive considerations: Mobile-specific code snippets and responsive grid layouts
• Professional polish: Subtle animations, backdrop blur effects, and gradient accents create a modern feel

Code Organization

• Well-structured component hierarchy with clear separation of concerns
• Good use of TypeScript for type safety
• Consistent naming conventions across new files

---

⚠️ Issues & Concerns

🐛 1. Critical: Code Duplication

The same CodeBlock component is duplicated across multiple files:

• RedesignedHero.tsx (lines 6-86)
• solutions/agents/page.tsx (lines 52-132)
• Likely in other solution pages as well

Recommendation: Extract to a shared component:

// components/v2/CodeBlock.tsx
export const CodeBlock = ({ code, fileName = "actor.ts" }) => { /* ... */ }

Then import it:

import { CodeBlock } from "@/components/v2/CodeBlock";

This is a high priority refactor to maintain DRY principles and make future updates easier.

---

🎨 2. Inline Syntax Highlighting Issues

The custom tokenizer in CodeBlock has several problems:

RedesignedHero.tsx (lines 26-77):

// This regex is fragile and won't handle edge cases well
const parts = current.split(/([a-zA-Z0-9_$]+|"[^"]*"|'[^']*'|\s+|[(){},.;:[\]])/g)

// String matching is basic and won't handle escaped quotes
else if (part.startsWith('"') || part.startsWith("'"))

CodeWalkthrough.tsx (lines 134-165): Uses even simpler token matching with part.trim() and includes(), which will cause false positives.

Recommendations:

1. Consider using a proper syntax highlighter like @shikijs/react or prism-react-renderer
2. If staying custom, extract the tokenizer logic to a separate utility function for testability
3. Add proper escaping support for strings with quotes inside

---

🔧 3. Next.js Best Practices

Icon Import Issue (Fixed in commits):
The PR history shows fixes for icon imports (faNextJs → faNextjs, faGitHub → faGithub). Good catch, but this suggests missing TypeScript checks or IDE autocomplete. Ensure your @rivet-gg/icons package exports are properly typed.

generateStaticParams Iterations:
Multiple commits tweaking generateStaticParams (async → sync → async) suggest uncertainty about Next.js 15 requirements. The final implementation looks correct, but verify:

• Next.js 15 supports async generateStaticParams (which you're using)
• The dynamicParams = false is intentional to prevent dynamic fallback

---

🚀 4. Performance Considerations

Intersection Observer Memory:

// CodeWalkthrough.tsx line 8
const observerRefs = useRef([]);

This ref array pattern can cause issues if the component re-renders with different step counts. Consider using a ref callback pattern or ensure proper cleanup.

Animation Performance:

• Multiple framer-motion animations trigger on scroll/view changes
• Consider using will-change: transform CSS for smoother animations
• The animate-pulse and animate-ping may cause layout shifts on some browsers

---

🔒 5. Security & Best Practices

No Security Issues Found ✅

• No user input handling
• No external data fetching in these components
• No dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage

Accessibility Concerns:

• The CodeBlock component should have aria-label or role="region" for screen readers
• Color-only indicators (like the pulsing dots) need text alternatives
• Consider adding skip links for the scroll-based CodeWalkthrough

---

📝 6. Minor Code Quality Issues

Unused Variables:

// RedesignedHero.tsx line 6
const CodeBlock = ({ code, fileName = "actor.ts" }) => {
  // fileName is used, but check other instances
}

Hardcoded Values:

• Color hex codes scattered throughout (e.g., #FF4500, #0A0A0A)
• Consider extracting to Tailwind config theme:

// tailwind.config.js
theme: {
  extend: {
    colors: {
      'rivet-orange': '#FF4500',
      'rivet-dark': '#0A0A0A'
    }
  }
}

Missing Error Boundaries:
These marketing pages don't have error boundaries. While not critical for static content, consider wrapping dynamic sections in error boundaries for production resilience.

---

🧪 7. Test Coverage

No Tests Included ⚠️

While this is a marketing site, consider adding:

1. Snapshot tests for key sections (prevents accidental visual regressions)
2. Accessibility tests using @testing-library/react + jest-axe
3. Interaction tests for the CodeWalkthrough scroll behavior

Example:

// __tests__/CodeWalkthrough.test.tsx
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import { axe } from 'jest-axe';
import { CodeWalkthrough } from '../CodeWalkthrough';

it('should have no accessibility violations', async () => {
  const { container } = render(<CodeWalkthrough />);
  expect(await axe(container)).toHaveNoViolations();
});

---

📋 Action Items

High Priority

• Extract duplicated CodeBlock component to shared location
• Fix fragile syntax highlighting tokenizer or replace with proper library
• Verify generateStaticParams behavior in Next.js 15 (appears correct but test thoroughly)

Medium Priority

• Add accessibility attributes (aria-labels, roles)
• Extract hardcoded colors to Tailwind theme
• Optimize IntersectionObserver ref handling

Low Priority (Nice to Have)

• Add basic test coverage for critical components
• Add error boundaries
• Consider performance optimizations for animations

---

🎯 Overall Assessment

This is a visually impressive redesign with strong UX patterns. The main concerns are:

1. Code duplication (easily fixable)
2. Custom tokenizer fragility (consider alternatives)
3. Missing tests (acceptable for now but add later)

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with changes

The issues are not blockers but should be addressed before merging to ensure maintainability. The design direction is excellent and will showcase Rivet's capabilities effectively.

---

Great work on the comprehensive redesign! Let me know if you'd like help implementing any of these suggestions.

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Changes

Overview

This PR introduces a comprehensive website redesign with new sections, improved components, and better visual design. The changes represent a significant overhaul of the marketing landing page.

---

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Strengths:

• Consistent Component Structure: All new sections follow a clear pattern with motion.div animations and viewport-aware rendering
• Good Use of React Hooks: Proper usage of useState, useEffect, and useRef throughout
• TypeScript Usage: Props are properly typed (e.g., FadeInProps interface)
• Reusable Components: Good abstraction with FadeIn, FadeInStagger, FadeInItem components

Concerns:

1. Missing TypeScript Types (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:8)

   const observerRefs = useRef([]);

   Should be:

   const observerRefs = useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([]);

2. Type Safety Issues (solutions/agents/page.tsx:35-36)

   const Badge = ({ text, color = "orange" }) => {

   Missing prop types. Should define an interface:

   interface BadgeProps {
     text: string;
     color?: "orange" | "blue" | "purple";
   }

3. Magic Numbers (ConceptSection.tsx:12, CodeWalkthrough.tsx:64)

   • Hard-coded timing values like 2000ms and "-40% 0px -40% 0px" should be extracted as named constants
   • Example: const SCROLL_STEP_INTERVAL = 2000;

---

🐛 Potential Bugs

1. Memory Leak Risk (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82)

   • The IntersectionObserver is created in useEffect with an empty dependency array
   • If observerRefs.current changes after mount, the observer won't update
   • Recommendation: Add dependencies or use a callback ref pattern

2. Array Mutation (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:181)

   ref={(el) => (observerRefs.current[idx] = el)}

   • Direct mutation of ref array could cause issues
   • Recommendation: Use a callback function that properly manages the array

3. Infinite Animation (ConceptSection.tsx:10-15)

   • The setInterval in ArchitectureComparison runs forever
   • While it has cleanup, consider pause/resume on visibility change for performance

4. String Splitting Logic (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:134)

   {line.split(/(\s+)/).map((part, i) => {

   • Regex syntax highlighting is naive and won't handle edge cases
   • Example: A string like "import something" would incorrectly highlight "import" inside the quotes
   • Recommendation: Use a proper syntax highlighting library like prism-react-renderer

---

⚡ Performance Considerations

1. Unnecessary Re-renders

   • Multiple components use inline object/array definitions in JSX (e.g., steps array in CodeWalkthrough)
   • Recommendation: Extract steps and codeLines outside component or use useMemo

2. Animation Performance

   • Heavy use of Framer Motion animations could impact performance on lower-end devices
   • Recommendation: Consider using will-change CSS property or transform instead of scale for better GPU acceleration

3. Large Bundle Size

   • Adding framer-motion and multiple icon sets (lucide-react) increases bundle
   • Current: 6,252 additions
   • Recommendation: Ensure code splitting is enabled for marketing pages

4. IntersectionObserver Thrashing (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:62-66)

   rootMargin: "-40% 0px -40% 0px",
   threshold: 0,

   • This creates a very sensitive observer that could fire frequently
   • Recommendation: Consider using threshold: [0, 0.25, 0.5] for better control

---

🔒 Security Concerns

✅ No major security issues identified

• No direct DOM manipulation
• No dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage
• No external data fetching without validation
• Client-side only components ("use client" directive used appropriately)

Minor note: The PR adds a new dependency @vbare/compiler in pnpm-lock.yaml. Verify this is intentional and from a trusted source.

---

🧪 Test Coverage

⚠️ Missing Tests

• No test files added for any of the new components
• High-value test candidates:
  • CodeWalkthrough scroll behavior and step highlighting
  • ConceptSection animation state transitions
  • FadeIn variants and timing
  • Responsive behavior on mobile/desktop

Recommendation: Add at least smoke tests for critical user-facing components.

---

📐 Design & UX

Positives:

• Excellent visual design with consistent color scheme (zinc/emerald/orange)
• Good mobile responsiveness with lg: breakpoints
• Smooth animations enhance user experience
• Good accessibility with semantic HTML

Suggestions:

1. Reduced Motion - Add support for prefers-reduced-motion media query

   const prefersReducedMotion = window.matchMedia('(prefers-reduced-motion: reduce)').matches;

2. Loading States - Consider skeleton screens for sections that depend on intersection observers

3. Keyboard Navigation - Verify tab order and focus states are clear

---

📝 Additional Observations

1. Dependency Changes:

   • @biomejs/biome added but not clear why (possibly for linting?)
   • @vbare/compiler added - what is this used for?
   • Several workspace dependency updates

2. Code Duplication: Multiple solution pages (agents, games, workflows, etc.) likely share similar patterns. Consider extracting shared templates.

3. Trailing Newlines: Some files have trailing newlines (CodeWalkthrough.tsx:223-224). Not critical but worth cleaning up.

4. Missing Cleanup (ConceptSection.tsx:14):

   • The clearInterval happens, but verify it works correctly on unmount

---

🎯 Recommendations Summary

High Priority:

1. Add TypeScript types to all component props
2. Fix the syntax highlighting logic or use a proper library
3. Add useMemo to expensive computations (steps, codeLines arrays)
4. Add prefers-reduced-motion support

Medium Priority:

1. Add basic test coverage for new components
2. Extract magic numbers to named constants
3. Fix ref array mutation pattern
4. Review and document new dependencies

Low Priority:

1. Consider code splitting for marketing pages
2. Extract shared patterns from solution pages
3. Clean up trailing newlines

---

Verdict

Overall: ✅ Approve with recommendations

This is a solid UI/UX improvement with well-structured React code. The main concerns are around TypeScript type safety, performance optimizations, and missing test coverage. None of the issues are blocking, but addressing the high-priority items would significantly improve code quality and maintainability.

Great work on the visual design and component architecture! 🎉

[claude]

Pull Request Review

This PR introduces a v5 website redesign with new landing page sections and solution pages.

Positive Aspects:

1. Good component organization - well-structured React components
2. Icon import fixes - correctly fixed faNextJs to faNextjs and faGitHub to faGithub
3. Consistent design system with proper color classes and animations
4. Proper semantic HTML and ARIA attributes

Potential Issues:

1. Missing Dependency - The @vbare/compiler package is added to engine in pnpm-lock.yaml but not used in the PR. Verify if needed or remove.

2. Component Re-renders - In CodeWalkthrough.tsx:70-81, IntersectionObserver options are recreated on every render. Consider memoizing or moving outside component.

3. Accessibility - Icons lack proper labels for screen readers. Add aria-label attributes to icon containers in SolutionsSection.tsx and similar files.

4. Animation Performance - blur-[1px] CSS filters can be expensive. Consider using only opacity changes or test on lower-end devices.

5. Type Safety - observerRefs array in CodeWalkthrough.tsx:44 lacks proper TypeScript typing. Recommend: useRef<(HTMLDivElement | null)[]>([])

6. Hardcoded Timing - Extract hardcoded timing values (2000ms, 2500ms intervals) as named constants.

Performance Considerations:

• Large bundle size with animations - consider code-splitting
• Framer Motion animations - ensure GPU-acceleration
• Consider React.memo() for child components

Testing:
No tests added for new components. Recommend adding basic smoke tests, especially for CodeWalkthrough IntersectionObserver logic.

Summary:
Solid UI refresh with well-structured components.

Priority:

1. High: Remove unused dependency, add TypeScript types
2. Medium: Performance optimizations
3. Low: Accessibility improvements, named constants

Great work on the redesign!

[claude]

Code Review - v5 Website Redesign

Thank you for this comprehensive website redesign! The new UI looks impressive with great animations and modern React patterns. I've completed a thorough review and found several important issues to address.

---

Critical Issues - Must Fix Before Merge

1. Improper "use client" Directive on Marketing Page

File: website/src/app/(v2)/(marketing)/(index)/page.tsx:1

The entire marketing page is marked as "use client", forcing all child components to be client-side rendered. This significantly impacts:

• SEO effectiveness (content not server-rendered)
• Initial page load performance (larger JS bundle)
• Core Web Vitals scores

Fix: Remove "use client" from the main page and only apply it to individual interactive components that need it. Most section components can render server-side with client-side animations.

2. Non-Functional Buttons Throughout

Files:

• RedesignedHero.tsx:135-142
• ObservabilitySection.tsx:63-70
• RedesignedCTA.tsx:41-46

Multiple <button> elements have no onClick handlers or navigation. These should be Next.js <Link> components:

// Current (broken):
<button className="...">Start Building</button>

// Should be:
<Link href="/docs" className="...">
  Start Building
</Link>

Impact: Broken user experience, accessibility issues, no keyboard navigation.

3. IntersectionObserver Dependency Issue

File: CodeWalkthrough.tsx:61-82

The useEffect has an empty dependency array, but relies on observerRefs.current which may not be fully populated on first render:

useEffect(() => {
  // ...
  observerRefs.current.forEach((ref) => {
    if (ref) observer.observe(ref);
  });
  return () => observer.disconnect();
}, []); // Empty deps - won't re-run if refs change

Impact: Scroll-based step highlighting may not work reliably.

---

High Priority Issues

4. Missing TypeScript Types

File: Header.tsx:352-457

// Missing type annotation:
function DocsMobileNavigation({ tree }) { ... }

// Should be:
function DocsMobileNavigation({ tree }: { tree?: React.ReactNode }) { ... }

Similar issues throughout with component props lacking proper TypeScript interfaces.

5. Performance: Unmemoized Code Tokenization

Files: RedesignedHero.tsx:26-76, solutions/agents/page.tsx:73-122, solutions/games/page.tsx:85-134

Complex inline tokenization logic creates React elements on every render without memoization:

{code.split("\n").map((line, i) => (
  <div key={i}>
    {(() => {
      const tokens = [];
      // Complex parsing executed every render
      parts.forEach((part, j) => {
        tokens.push(<span key={j}>{part}</span>);
      });
      return tokens;
    })()}
  </div>
))}

Fix: Use useMemo to cache tokenization results.

6. Code Duplication: getColorClasses

Files: solutions/agents/page.tsx:136-149, solutions/games/page.tsx:148-161

The getColorClasses function is duplicated across multiple solution pages. Extract to a shared utility file.

---

Medium Priority Issues

7. Hardcoded Animation Delays

Animation timing values like delay: idx * 0.1 are scattered throughout components. Define timing constants for consistency:

const ANIMATION_TIMING = {
  duration: 0.5,
  staggerDelay: 0.1,
};

8. Excessive Inline Styles

File: FeaturesSection.tsx:281-362

Large <style> blocks (80+ lines of keyframes) are embedded in components. Move to CSS modules or global styles for better performance.

9. Component Size

Several files exceed 700 lines with multiple components. Consider splitting into smaller, focused files:

/solutions/agents/
  page.tsx
  components/
    Badge.tsx
    CodeBlock.tsx
    SolutionCard.tsx

---

Accessibility Concerns

10. Color Contrast

Several text colors may not meet WCAG AA standards:

• text-zinc-400 on bg-black
• text-zinc-500 on bg-zinc-900

Run an automated contrast checker to ensure compliance.

11. Keyboard Navigation

File: Header.tsx:51-142

The SolutionsDropdown uses mouse events to control visibility. Verify keyboard-only navigation works properly with the underlying DropdownMenu component.

12. Focus Indicators

Ensure all interactive elements have visible focus indicators:

className="... focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-white/20"

---

Security

13. External Links

Verify all external links (Discord, GitHub) use Next.js <Link> component which automatically adds rel="noopener noreferrer".

---

Best Practices

14. Missing PropTypes/Interfaces

Many components lack proper TypeScript interfaces:

// Current:
const Badge = ({ text, color = "orange" }) => { ... }

// Should be:
interface BadgeProps {
  text: string;
  color?: "orange" | "blue" | "purple";
}
const Badge = ({ text, color = "orange" }: BadgeProps) => { ... }

---

Testing Recommendations

Before merging, please test:

1. Keyboard Navigation: All interactive elements accessible via keyboard
2. Screen Reader: Test with NVDA/JAWS/VoiceOver
3. Performance: Run Lighthouse audits on all new pages
4. Mobile: Test animations on low-end devices
5. Browser Compatibility: Verify animations in Safari, Firefox, Chrome

---

Summary

Must Fix:

• Remove "use client" from main marketing page
• Convert non-functional buttons to proper <Link> components
• Add TypeScript types throughout
• Fix IntersectionObserver dependencies

Should Fix:

• Memoize code tokenization logic
• Extract duplicate utilities
• Address accessibility issues

Overall: This is a visually impressive redesign with good use of modern React patterns. The critical issues are straightforward to fix, and once addressed, this will be a great improvement to the website.

Nice work! 🚀

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Changes

This PR introduces a complete redesign of the Rivet marketing website. Overall code quality is good, but several issues should be addressed:

CRITICAL ISSUES

1. Memory Leak Risk in CodeWalkthrough.tsx Line 8

• The observerRefs array is untyped
• Fix: Add proper typing

2. Missing Cleanup Documentation

• Empty dependency arrays in useEffect hooks need comments explaining why

QUALITY AND BEST PRACTICES

3. Hardcoded Animation Timing

• Extract timing values to constants

4. Accessibility Concerns

• No ARIA labels on step indicators
• Missing keyboard navigation
• blur-[1px] may reduce readability for visually impaired users
• Add aria-current to active step

5. Performance

• Syntax highlighting in CodeWalkthrough.tsx runs on every render
• Recommendation: Use useMemo for highlighted code

6. Inconsistent Color Palette

• Mix of hardcoded colors and Tailwind classes
• Consolidate in Tailwind config

SECURITY

• No issues found - purely frontend marketing content

DEPENDENCIES

8. New Dependency: @vbare/compiler v0.0.3

• Pre-release software
• Added to engine package but not clearly used in this PR
• Should this be in a separate PR?

TESTING

• No test files included
• Add unit tests for animation logic
• Add integration tests for IntersectionObserver
• Test responsive behavior

WHAT IS GOOD

1. Clean component structure
2. Smooth animations with Framer Motion
3. Mobile-first responsive design
4. Clear visual hierarchy
5. Good TypeScript usage with minor improvements needed

SUMMARY

Approve with Changes Requested

Priority Fixes:

• Add TypeScript typing to observerRefs
• Add accessibility attributes
• Clarify or remove @vbare/compiler dependency
• Add basic test coverage

Nice-to-Haves:

• Extract animation constants
• Memoize syntax highlighting
• Add JSDoc documentation
• Consolidate color palette

Great work on the redesign! The visual improvements are significant.

Reviewed with: Claude Code

[claude]

PR Review: v5 Website Redesign

Thanks for the comprehensive website redesign! This is a significant UI/UX update with 6,198 additions across 23 files.

Strengths

1. Well-Structured Component Architecture

• Clean separation of concerns with dedicated section components
• Good use of TypeScript and proper use of client directives

2. Excellent Animation and UX

• Effective use of Framer Motion for smooth transitions
• Good Intersection Observer implementation in CodeWalkthrough.tsx
• Responsive design with mobile fallbacks

3. Accessibility

• Semantic HTML structure with proper heading hierarchy

Issues to Address

Critical: Type Safety in CodeWalkthrough.tsx line 8

• The observerRefs array is not typed. Add proper TypeScript typing.

Performance: Inefficient Re-renders

• CodeWalkthrough.tsx lines 117-169: Syntax highlighting logic runs on every render. Use useMemo to optimize.
• RedesignedHero.tsx lines 26-77: Inline tokenizer re-processes code on every render. Consider memoization.

Code Quality Issues

1. Magic numbers should be extracted to constants (ConceptSection.tsx line 12, line 13; CodeWalkthrough.tsx line 64)
2. RedesignedHero.tsx: Comment parsing is fragile. Consider using a proper syntax highlighting library like prism-react-renderer.
3. Missing error boundaries around complex animations

TypeScript Issues

1. CodeWalkthrough.tsx line 8: Missing type annotation for ref array
2. RedesignedHero.tsx line 6: CodeBlock component needs proper interface

Minor Issues

• Unused import: ConceptSection.tsx line 4 imports Check from lucide-react but doesn't use it

Security: No Critical Issues Found

Suggested Action Items

High Priority:

• Fix TypeScript types for observerRefs
• Memoize expensive syntax highlighting computations
• Extract magic numbers to named constants
• Add proper TypeScript interfaces for component props

Medium Priority:

• Remove unused imports
• Consider code splitting for large sections
• Test on actual mobile devices

Low Priority:

• Consider using a proper syntax highlighting library
• Add prefers-reduced-motion support

Overall, solid work! Main issues are performance optimization and type safety. Once high-priority items are addressed, this should be good to merge.