Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Request for information on the extensibility of ROS 2.0 messages #166

Open
clalancette opened this issue Mar 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Open

Request for information on the extensibility of ROS 2.0 messages #166

clalancette opened this issue Mar 15, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested

Comments

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

Originally from @andreasBihlmaier in #70:

Please add a short paragraph about "Binary compatibility of message revisions" in the current DDS implementation. For me the most relevant question is whether it will be possible to preserve backward compatibility if messages are extended, e.g. will addition of fields (or even constants) break compatibility as in ROS 1.0 (e.g. as between Indigo and Jade ros/common_msgs@7e11635)?
@clalancette clalancette mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2018
Closed
@clalancette clalancette added the question Further information is requested label Mar 15, 2018
@clalancette clalancette added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@clalancette