Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make lifecycle impl get_current_state() const. #2031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2022

Conversation

clalancette
Copy link
Contributor

We should only need to update the current state when it changes, so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const). Then we can just return the current_state_ object in get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette clalancette@openrobotics.org

@fujitatomoya FYI. Once we have this in, I think we can then rebase #1756 and it should make a lot more sense.

We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@clalancette
Copy link
Contributor Author

Green CI and approved, so going ahead and merging this. Thanks for the review!

@clalancette clalancette merged commit 2d32d03 into rolling Oct 24, 2022
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the clalancette/lifecycle-get-current-state-const branch October 24, 2022 21:14
Copy link
Collaborator

@fujitatomoya fujitatomoya left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry i was one step behind to review, a couple of minor comments.

alsora pushed a commit to irobot-ros/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
alsora pushed a commit to irobot-ros/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2023
We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
alsora pushed a commit to irobot-ros/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
alsora pushed a commit to irobot-ros/rclcpp that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2023
We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
alsora pushed a commit to irobot-ros/rclcpp that referenced this pull request May 3, 2023
We should only need to update the current state when it changes,
so we do that in the change_state method (which is not const).
Then we can just return the current_state_ object in
get_current_state, and then mark it as const.

Signed-off-by: Chris Lalancette <clalancette@openrobotics.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants