Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move repeated logic for C include prefix into common function #432

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2020

Conversation

jacobperron
Copy link
Member

The same logic for stripping the end of the include prefix for services and actions was repeated in several places.
This is a minor refactor moving the logic to a common place.

The same logic for stripping the end of the include prefix for services and actions was repeated in several places.
This is a minor refactor moving the logic to a common place.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Perron <jacob@openrobotics.org>
jacobperron added a commit to ros2/rosidl_typesupport_connext that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2020
Depends on ros2/rosidl#432

Signed-off-by: Jacob Perron <jacob@openrobotics.org>
Copy link
Member

@mjcarroll mjcarroll left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jacobperron jacobperron added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2020
@jacobperron
Copy link
Member Author

jacobperron commented Jan 22, 2020

CI for this and the connected PR:

  • Linux Build Status
  • Linux-aarch64 Build Status
  • macOS Build Status
  • Windows Build Status

@jacobperron jacobperron merged commit 36fec3a into master Jan 22, 2020
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch bot deleted the jacob/minor_rosidl_c_refactor branch January 22, 2020 17:29
jacobperron added a commit to ros2/rosidl_typesupport_connext that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2020
Depends on ros2/rosidl#432

Signed-off-by: Jacob Perron <jacob@openrobotics.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants