@@ -866,9 +866,10 @@ def add(args)
866866 # operations in order.
867867 #
868868 # Each of the operations appearing in the Array must itself be an Array
869- # with exactly three elements: an operator:: must be :add, :replace, or
870- # :delete an attribute name:: the attribute name (string or symbol) to
871- # modify a value:: either a string or an array of strings.
869+ # with exactly three elements:
870+ # an operator :: must be :add, :replace, or :delete
871+ # an attribute name :: the attribute name (string or symbol) to modify
872+ # a value :: either a string or an array of strings.
872873 #
873874 # The :add operator will, unsurprisingly, add the specified values to the
874875 # specified attribute. If the attribute does not already exist, :add will
@@ -911,13 +912,13 @@ def add(args)
911912 # may not get extended information that will tell you which one failed.
912913 # #modify has no notion of an atomic transaction. If you specify a chain
913914 # of modifications in one call to #modify, and one of them fails, the
914- # preceding ones will usually not be "rolled back, " resulting in a
915+ # preceding ones will usually not be "rolled back", resulting in a
915916 # partial update. This is a limitation of the LDAP protocol, not of
916917 # Net::LDAP.
917918 #
918919 # The lack of transactional atomicity in LDAP means that you're usually
919920 # better off using the convenience methods #add_attribute,
920- # #replace_attribute, and #delete_attribute, which are are wrappers over
921+ # #replace_attribute, and #delete_attribute, which are wrappers over
921922 # #modify. However, certain LDAP servers may provide concurrency
922923 # semantics, in which the several operations contained in a single #modify
923924 # call are not interleaved with other modification-requests received
0 commit comments