try to make the local archive-index-write more durable #2995
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
syphar
force-pushed
the
durable-write
branch
from
d85ec11 to
91e0466
Compare
GuillaumeGomez
approved these changes
Nov 15, 2025
github-actions
bot
added
S-waiting-on-deploy
syphar
removed
the
S-waiting-on-deploy
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This partially goes back to how we locally write into the cache files, see e981dfb
I hope this solves this sentry issue,
though I'm not sure how to test it better.
The other change was that previously I didn't stream the write, though it would surprise me.