-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
Description
Proposal
Problem statement
Add a way to write formatted data to a Vec<u8> (instead of a String). The "straightforward" solution of implementing fmt::Write for Vec<u8> would risk causing ambiguities with the write! macro, so this proposes a dedicated API.
Motivating examples or use cases
Writing formatted data to a Vec<u8> buffer is currently awkward; you can either:
use core::fmt::{self, Display};
// ...use `io::Write` and map the error back.
// This isn't available in no-std code, and is somewhat confusing.
// It also has worse codegen because the error path constructs a `io::Error` only to immediately drop it.
fn write_with_io(buffer: &mut Vec<u8>, data: &dyn Display) -> fmt::Result {
use std::io::Write;
write!(buffer, "the data is: {data}").map_err(|_| std::fmt::Error)
}
// ...use a temporary string. This works in no-std, but incurs an extra allocation.
fn write_with_tmp(buffer: &mut Vec<u8>, data: &dyn Display) -> fmt::Result {
let tmp = format!("the data is: {data}");
buffer.extend_from_slice(tmp.as_bytes());
Ok(())
}Solution sketch
// in alloc::fmt
pub fn write_to_buf(buf: &mut Vec<u8>, args: Arguments<'_>) -> Result;
#[repr(transparent)]
pub struct FmtBuffer {
// SAFETY: only appending bytes is allowed, as the source may rely on existing data being valid UTF8
raw: Vec<u8>,
}
impl FmtBuffer {
pub fn from_vec(buf: &mut Vec<u8>) -> &mut Self;
// Could be omitted
pub fn from_string(buf: &mut String) -> &mut Self;
pub fn reserve(&mut self, len: usize);
// Needed to make `write!` work without requiring having `fmt::Write` in scope.
pub fn write_fmt(&mut self, args: Arguments<'_>) -> Result;
}
impl Write for FmtBuffer;
impl Deref for FmtBuffer {
type Target = [u8];
}
// Note: no DerefMut; this would conflict with `FmtBuffer::from_string`Alternatives
- Only provide the
write_to_buffree function. - Do not provide
FmtBuffer::from_string; this would allow implementingDerefMut<Target=Vec<u8>>. - Implement
FmtBufferasstruct FmtBuffer<'a>(&'a mut Vec<u8>)instead; this skips needingtransmutes in the constructors, but adds an extra level of indirection. The (slight) performance cost could probably be mitigated by adding a newSpecWriteFmtimpl.
What happens now?
This issue contains an API change proposal (or ACP) and is part of the libs-api team feature lifecycle. Once this issue is filed, the libs-api team will review open proposals as capability becomes available. Current response times do not have a clear estimate, but may be up to several months.
Possible responses
The libs team may respond in various different ways. First, the team will consider the problem (this doesn't require any concrete solution or alternatives to have been proposed):
- We think this problem seems worth solving, and the standard library might be the right place to solve it.
- We think that this probably doesn't belong in the standard library.
Second, if there's a concrete solution:
- We think this specific solution looks roughly right, approved, you or someone else should implement this. (Further review will still happen on the subsequent implementation PR.)
- We're not sure this is the right solution, and the alternatives or other materials don't give us enough information to be sure about that. Here are some questions we have that aren't answered, or rough ideas about alternatives we'd want to see discussed.