Skip to content

Conversation

devonhollowood
Copy link
Contributor

Implement #504

@Manishearth
Copy link
Member

LGTM, thanks!

Manishearth added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2015
@Manishearth Manishearth merged commit 261bed1 into rust-lang:master Dec 31, 2015
qmwrygdxpzc pushed a commit to ceptontech/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Previously the program only fixed the code when the closure supplied to
the function contained only 1 line.  This patch removes the restriction.

The code already works.  This patch only removes the extra check that
causes the restriction.  The test cases that can now be fixed are moved
into the files containing tests cases that can be fixed.

The extra check has survived in the code this way.

- In Dec 2015, patch a6bd2d0, pull request rust-lang#524.  The lint was
  first added.  The program did not support fixing code automatically
  yet.  So the suggested fix was printed as a part of the diagnostic
  message.  When the original code contained multiple lines, the
  suggested fix was omitted in order to keep the diagnostic message
  concise.

- In May 2019, patch bd0b75f, pull request rust-lang#4049.  Logic was added
  to strip the reference in the closure when the suggested replacement
  method required it.  Because the fix was still only printed when the
  code contained a single line, the new transformation was only done
  when the code contained a single line.

- In Aug 2019, patch 945d4cf, pull request rust-lang#4454.  The lint was
  updated to fix code automatically.  Because the fixed code had only
  been printed in the diagnostic message for a single line, the fix was
  only added for a single line.

- In Nov 2021, patch 092fe20, pull request rust-lang#7463.  The logic for
  transforming the closure was moved into another file.  A comment
  was added saying that it was only good for a single line because it
  had only been used for a single line.

changelog: [`search_is_some`] now fixes code spanning multiple lines
qmwrygdxpzc pushed a commit to ceptontech/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Previously the program only fixed the code when the closure supplied to
the method contained only 1 line.  This patch removes the restriction.

The code already works.  This patch only removes the extra check that
causes the restriction.  The test cases that can now be fixed are moved
into the files containing tests cases that can be fixed.

The extra check has survived in the code this way.

- In Dec 2015, patch a6bd2d0, pull request rust-lang#524.  The lint was
  first added.  The program did not support fixing code automatically
  yet.  So the suggested fix was printed as a part of the diagnostic
  message.  When the original code contained multiple lines, the
  suggested fix was omitted in order to keep the diagnostic message
  concise.

- In May 2019, patch bd0b75f, pull request rust-lang#4049.  Logic was added
  to strip the reference in the closure when the suggested replacement
  method required it.  Because the fix was still only printed when the
  code contained a single line, the new transformation was only done
  when the code contained a single line.

- In Aug 2019, patch 945d4cf, pull request rust-lang#4454.  The lint was
  updated to fix code automatically.  Because the fixed code had only
  been printed in the diagnostic message for a single line, the fix was
  only added for a single line.

- In Nov 2021, patch 092fe20, pull request rust-lang#7463.  The logic for
  transforming the closure was moved into another file.  A comment
  was added saying that it was only good for a single line because it
  had only been used for a single line.

changelog: [`search_is_some`] now fixes code spanning multiple lines
qmwrygdxpzc pushed a commit to ceptontech/rust-clippy that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2025
Previously the program only fixed the code when the closure supplied to
the method contained only 1 line.  This patch removes the restriction.

The code already works.  This patch only removes the extra check that
causes the restriction.  The test cases that can now be fixed are moved
into the files containing tests cases that can be fixed.

The unnecessary check has survived in the code this way.

- In Dec 2015, patch a6bd2d0, pull request rust-lang#524.  The lint was
  first added.  The program did not support fixing code automatically
  yet.  So the suggested fix was printed as a part of the diagnostic
  message.  When the original code contained multiple lines, the
  suggested fix was omitted in order to keep the diagnostic message
  concise.

- In May 2019, patch bd0b75f, pull request rust-lang#4049.  Logic was added
  to strip the reference in the closure when the suggested replacement
  method required it.  Because the fix was still only printed when the
  code contained a single line, the new transformation was only done
  when the code contained a single line.

- In Aug 2019, patch 945d4cf, pull request rust-lang#4454.  The lint was
  updated to fix code automatically.  Because the fixed code had only
  been printed in the diagnostic message for a single line, the fix was
  only added for a single line.

- In Nov 2021, patch 092fe20, pull request rust-lang#7463.  The logic for
  transforming the closure was moved into another file.  A comment
  was added saying that it was only good for a single line because it
  had only been used for a single line.

changelog: [`search_is_some`] now fixes code spanning multiple lines
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants