Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: adapt for LLVM change 5b386b864c7619897c51a1da97d78f1cf6f3eff6 #110455

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2023

Conversation

durin42
Copy link
Contributor

@durin42 durin42 commented Apr 17, 2023

The above-mentioned change modified the output of thread-local.rs by changing some variable names. Rather than assume things get put in %0, we capture the variable so the test passes in both the old and new version.

The above-mentioned change modified the output of thread-local.rs by
changing some variable names. Rather than assume things get put in %0,
we capture the variable so the test passes in both the old and new
version.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Apr 17, 2023

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Apr 17, 2023
@durin42
Copy link
Contributor Author

durin42 commented Apr 17, 2023

@rustbot label: +llvm-main

r? @nikic

@rustbot rustbot added the llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) label Apr 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot assigned nikic and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum Apr 17, 2023
@nikic
Copy link
Contributor

nikic commented Apr 17, 2023

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 17, 2023

📌 Commit bef3502 has been approved by nikic

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Apr 17, 2023
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104055 (Migrate diagnostics in `rustc_borrowck`)
 - rust-lang#110257 (fix false positives for `unused_parens` around unary and binary operations)
 - rust-lang#110313 (allow `repr(align = x)` on inherent methods)
 - rust-lang#110337 (Correct default value for default-linker-libraries)
 - rust-lang#110386 (Clean up traversal macros)
 - rust-lang#110394 (Various minor Idx-related tweaks)
 - rust-lang#110425 (Encode def span for `ConstParam`)
 - rust-lang#110434 (Check freeze with right param-env in `deduced_param_attrs`)
 - rust-lang#110455 (tests: adapt for LLVM change 5b386b8)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit c81e8b8 into rust-lang:master Apr 17, 2023
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.71.0 milestone Apr 17, 2023
@durin42 durin42 deleted the tls-D148269-fix branch October 20, 2023 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants