Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note about object lifetime defaults in does not live long enough error #117835

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 21, 2023

Conversation

Nilstrieb
Copy link
Member

@Nilstrieb Nilstrieb commented Nov 12, 2023

This is a aspect of Rust that frequently trips up people who are not aware of it yet. This diagnostic attempts to explain what's happening and why the lifetime constraint, that was never mentioned in the source, arose.

The implementation feels a bit questionable, I'm not sure whether there are better ways to do this. There probably are.

fixes #117835

r? types

This is a aspect of Rust that frequently trips up people who are not
aware of it yet. This diagnostic attempts to explain what's happening
and why the lifetime constraint, that was never mentioned in the source,
arose.
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 12, 2023
@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Nov 12, 2023

cc #116765

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Interesting approach. I didn't look too closely at the actual logic in the object lifetime default "manual" elaboration, namely I didn't try to think of places where it would provide false-positives. But given the pain of cases where this fails, I'd opt to land this now and wait until folks find places where the diagnostic is wrong 😃

r? compiler-errors @bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Nov 20, 2023

📌 Commit e5c330a has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Nov 20, 2023
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117327 (Add documentation for some queries)
 - rust-lang#117835 (Note about object lifetime defaults in does not live long enough error)
 - rust-lang#117851 (Uplift `InferConst` to `rustc_type_ir`)
 - rust-lang#117973 (test: Add test for async-move in 2015 Rust proc macro)
 - rust-lang#117992 (Don't require intercrate mode for negative coherence)
 - rust-lang#118010 (Typeck break expr even if break is illegal)
 - rust-lang#118026 (Don't consider regions in `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint)
 - rust-lang#118089 (intercrate_ambiguity_causes: handle self ty infer + reservation impls)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117327 (Add documentation for some queries)
 - rust-lang#117835 (Note about object lifetime defaults in does not live long enough error)
 - rust-lang#117851 (Uplift `InferConst` to `rustc_type_ir`)
 - rust-lang#117973 (test: Add test for async-move in 2015 Rust proc macro)
 - rust-lang#117992 (Don't require intercrate mode for negative coherence)
 - rust-lang#118010 (Typeck break expr even if break is illegal)
 - rust-lang#118026 (Don't consider regions in `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint)
 - rust-lang#118089 (intercrate_ambiguity_causes: handle self ty infer + reservation impls)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#117327 (Add documentation for some queries)
 - rust-lang#117835 (Note about object lifetime defaults in does not live long enough error)
 - rust-lang#117851 (Uplift `InferConst` to `rustc_type_ir`)
 - rust-lang#117973 (test: Add test for async-move in 2015 Rust proc macro)
 - rust-lang#117992 (Don't require intercrate mode for negative coherence)
 - rust-lang#118010 (Typeck break expr even if break is illegal)
 - rust-lang#118026 (Don't consider regions in `deref_into_dyn_supertrait` lint)
 - rust-lang#118089 (intercrate_ambiguity_causes: handle self ty infer + reservation impls)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors closed this in 8754087 Nov 21, 2023
@bors bors merged commit 8754087 into rust-lang:master Nov 21, 2023
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
Rollup merge of rust-lang#117835 - Nilstrieb:note-object-lifetime-defaults, r=compiler-errors

Note about object lifetime defaults in does not live long enough error

This is a aspect of Rust that frequently trips up people who are not aware of it yet. This diagnostic attempts to explain what's happening and why the lifetime constraint, that was never mentioned in the source, arose.

The implementation feels a bit questionable, I'm not sure whether there are better ways to do this. There probably are.

fixes rust-lang#117835

r? types
@Nilstrieb Nilstrieb deleted the note-object-lifetime-defaults branch November 21, 2023 05:49
@cuviper cuviper added this to the 1.76.0 milestone May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants