Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid a collection and iteration on empty passes #120853

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 10, 2024

Conversation

blyxyas
Copy link
Member

@blyxyas blyxyas commented Feb 9, 2024

Just some mini optimization I saw in the wild. This way, we avoid a collect and map on an empty passes. Honestly, I don't even think this is big enough of a change to make a benchmark, but I'd still like to see results.

Based on this book

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 9, 2024

r? @cjgillot

rustbot has assigned @cjgillot.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 9, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

cjgillot commented Feb 9, 2024

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 9, 2024

📌 Commit 4ef1790 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 9, 2024
@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

next time, pls amend the commit with any formatter changes (or install the tidy hook in x.py setup)

matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
Avoid a collection and iteration on empty passes

Just some mini optimization I saw in the wild. This way, we avoid a `collect` and `map` on an empty `passes`. Honestly, I don't even think this is big enough of a change to make a benchmark, but I'd still like to see results.

Based on [this book](https://nnethercote.github.io/perf-book/iterators.html#collect-and-extend)
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120584 (For a rigid projection, recursively look at the self type's item bounds to fix the `associated_type_bounds` feature)
 - rust-lang#120589 (std::thread::available_parallelism merging linux/android/freebsd version)
 - rust-lang#120596 ([rustdoc] Correctly generate path for non-local items in source code pages)
 - rust-lang#120629 (Move some test files)
 - rust-lang#120846 (Update jobserver-rs to 0.1.28)
 - rust-lang#120850 (ast_lowering: Fix regression in `use ::{}` imports.)
 - rust-lang#120853 (Avoid a collection and iteration on empty passes)

Failed merges:

 - rust-lang#120549 (modify alias-relate to also normalize ambiguous opaques)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#120584 (For a rigid projection, recursively look at the self type's item bounds to fix the `associated_type_bounds` feature)
 - rust-lang#120596 ([rustdoc] Correctly generate path for non-local items in source code pages)
 - rust-lang#120629 (Move some test files)
 - rust-lang#120846 (Update jobserver-rs to 0.1.28)
 - rust-lang#120850 (ast_lowering: Fix regression in `use ::{}` imports.)
 - rust-lang#120853 (Avoid a collection and iteration on empty passes)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8e1eadd into rust-lang:master Feb 10, 2024
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 10, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#120853 - blyxyas:no-collect, r=cjgillot

Avoid a collection and iteration on empty passes

Just some mini optimization I saw in the wild. This way, we avoid a `collect` and `map` on an empty `passes`. Honestly, I don't even think this is big enough of a change to make a benchmark, but I'd still like to see results.

Based on [this book](https://nnethercote.github.io/perf-book/iterators.html#collect-and-extend)
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.78.0 milestone Feb 10, 2024
@blyxyas blyxyas deleted the no-collect branch February 13, 2024 19:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants