Rollup of 2 pull requests

[matthiaskrgr]

Successful merges:

• Emit an error when rustc_doc_primitive has an unknown value #123584 (Emit an error when rustc_doc_primitive has an unknown value)
• sys_common::thread_local_key: make a note that this is not used on Windows #123589 (sys_common::thread_local_key: make a note that this is not used on Windows)

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

[matthiaskrgr]

@bors r+ rollup=never p=2

[bors]

📌 Commit e5bdd7e has been approved by matthiaskrgr

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit e5bdd7e with merge e78913b...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: matthiaskrgr
Pushing e78913b to master...

[rust-timer]

📌 Perf builds for each rolled up PR:

PR#	Message	Perf Build Sha
#123584	Emit an error when rustc_doc_primitive has an unknown val…	b22d0208d24a3e96425eb9cd3b292ffe372b2a20 (link)
#123589	sys_common::thread_local_key: make a note that this is not …	29e87c61fbd1bc1174e9c0f8f1ef7eafc79c91fb (link)

previous master: 4e431fad67

In the case of a perf regression, run the following command for each PR you suspect might be the cause: @rust-timer build $SHA

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (e78913b): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.4%	[0.4%, 0.4%]	1
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.9%	[-1.5%, -0.3%]	2
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	3.7%	[3.4%, 3.8%]	3
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.6%	[0.7%, 4.5%]	28
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	3.7%	[3.4%, 3.8%]	3

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.2%	[1.4%, 2.7%]	5
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-	-	0
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 667.449s -> 667.569s (0.02%)
Artifact size: 318.47 MiB -> 318.50 MiB (0.01%)