Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reference tidying #24548

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Apr 18, 2015
Merged

Reference tidying #24548

merged 7 commits into from
Apr 18, 2015

Conversation

graydon
Copy link
Contributor

@graydon graydon commented Apr 18, 2015

This just deletes some egregious lies and obsolete terminology -- all of which I originally wrote -- from the reference. I expect the reference itself will be deleted soon enough, but I found myself gritting teeth over these bits too much to let them into a 1.0 release.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @brson

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Apr 18, 2015

📌 Commit a99a8b0 has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️👌👍

@@ -3888,7 +3883,7 @@ Box<i32>, y: Box<i32>)` declare one mutable variable `x` and one immutable
variable `y`).

Methods that take either `self` or `Box<Self>` can optionally place them in a
mutable slot by prefixing them with `mut` (similar to regular arguments):
mutable variable by prefixing them with `mut` (similar to regular arguments):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually I think the original word "slot" might be more accurate.
If I have to change "slot" to something I would use "binding" in this case.
See #24149

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, binding is fine. Slot is just very old terminology, the only uses in this sense remaining are weird old corners of trans inside the compiler. In the docs it's a dead term, sticks out.

Manishearth added a commit to Manishearth/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2015
…labnik

This just deletes some egregious lies and obsolete terminology -- all of which I originally wrote -- from the reference. I expect the reference itself will be deleted soon enough, but I found myself gritting teeth over these bits too much to let them into a 1.0 release.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 18, 2015
@bors bors merged commit a99a8b0 into rust-lang:master Apr 18, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants