Skip to content

Conversation

frankmcsherry
Copy link
Contributor

The original description suggests that the original Rc<T> itself is downgraded, which doesn't seem to be what the code does. At the same time, Rc is one of those types that can do weird things with only a shared reference, so I thought it would be good to be clear.

The original description suggests that the original `Rc<T>` itself is downgraded, which doesn't seem to be what the code does. At the same time, `Rc` is one of those types that can do weird things with only a shared reference, so I thought it would be good to be clear.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @brson (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ 094f1c4 rollup

Good catch!

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2016
Update rc.rs

The original description suggests that the original `Rc<T>` itself is downgraded, which doesn't seem to be what the code does. At the same time, `Rc` is one of those types that can do weird things with only a shared reference, so I thought it would be good to be clear.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2016
Rollup of 13 pull requests

- Successful merges: #33645, #33897, #33945, #34007, #34060, #34070, #34094, #34098, #34099, #34104, #34124, #34125, #34138
- Failed merges:
@bors bors merged commit 094f1c4 into rust-lang:master Jun 7, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants