Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation #68039

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 10, 2020

Conversation

euclio
Copy link
Contributor

@euclio euclio commented Jan 9, 2020

strip-hidden is now implied by --document-private-items with #67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @nikomatsakis

(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jan 9, 2020
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 10, 2020

r? dtolnay
@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jan 10, 2020

📌 Commit 8267807 has been approved by dtolnay

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jan 10, 2020
@dtolnay
Copy link
Member

dtolnay commented Jan 10, 2020

Thanks! Good catch.

Dylan-DPC-zz pushed a commit to Dylan-DPC-zz/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation

`strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation

`strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
Centril added a commit to Centril/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation

`strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation

`strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation

`strip-hidden` is now implied by `--document-private-items` with rust-lang#67875, so there's no need to specify it anymore.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 10, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #66045 (Add method Result::into_ok)
 - #67258 (Introduce `X..`, `..X`, and `..=X` range patterns)
 - #68014 (Unify output of "variant not found" errors)
 - #68019 (Build compiletest with in-tree libtest)
 - #68039 (remove explicit strip-hidden pass from compiler doc generation)
 - #68050 (Canonicalize rustc_error imports)
 - #68059 (Allow specifying LLVM args in target specifications)
 - #68075 (rustbuild: Cleanup book generation)

Failed merges:

 - #68089 (Unstabilize `Vec::remove_item`)

r? @ghost
@dtolnay dtolnay assigned dtolnay and unassigned nikomatsakis Jan 10, 2020
@bors bors merged commit 8267807 into rust-lang:master Jan 10, 2020
@euclio euclio deleted the remove-strip-hidden branch January 10, 2020 23:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants