Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stabilize `core::iter::once_with()` #68800

merged 1 commit into from Feb 3, 2020


Copy link

JohnTitor commented Feb 3, 2020

Centril approved these changes Feb 3, 2020

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

Centril commented Feb 3, 2020

r? @Centril @bors r+ rollup


This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

bors commented Feb 3, 2020

📌 Commit 7e2d7e0 has been approved by Centril

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned Centril and unassigned SimonSapin Feb 3, 2020
Dylan-DPC added a commit to Dylan-DPC/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2020

Stabilize `core::iter::once_with()`

Fixes rust-lang#57581

FCP: rust-lang#57581 (comment)

r? @SimonSapin
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 3, 2020
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #68678 (Install robots.txt into rust-docs tarballs)
 - #68711 (Added upper bound of what vecs and boxes can allocate)
 - #68744 (Do not ICE in `type-alias-impl-trait` with save-analysis)
 - #68777 (Clean up E0263 explanation)
 - #68787 (Optimize core::ptr::align_offset (part 1))
 - #68797 (Fix links to types instead of modules)
 - #68798 (Test that `#[track_caller]` as `fn()` respects RT / CTFE equivalence)
 - #68800 (Stabilize `core::iter::once_with()`)

Failed merges:

r? @ghost
@bors bors merged commit 7e2d7e0 into rust-lang:master Feb 3, 2020
4 checks passed
4 checks passed
pr Build #20200203.29 succeeded
pr (Linux mingw-check) Linux mingw-check succeeded
pr (Linux x86_64-gnu-llvm-7) Linux x86_64-gnu-llvm-7 succeeded
pr (Linux x86_64-gnu-tools) Linux x86_64-gnu-tools succeeded
@JohnTitor JohnTitor deleted the JohnTitor:stabilize-once-with branch Feb 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
None yet
Linked issues

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.