Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

clean up clean::Static struct #82004

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2021

Conversation

GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

Having a String for the expression didn't make much sense, and even less when it's actually not used (except in json so I kept it).

r? @jyn514

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jyn514 jyn514 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch, thanks.

src/librustdoc/clean/inline.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
@jyn514 jyn514 added C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 11, 2021
@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Feb 11, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Feb 11, 2021

📌 Commit 583563d has been approved by jyn514

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Feb 11, 2021
JohnTitor added a commit to JohnTitor/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2021
… r=jyn514

clean up clean::Static struct

Having a `String` for the expression didn't make much sense, and even less when it's actually not used (except in json so I kept it).

r? `@jyn514`
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2021
Rollup of 16 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#79983 (fix indefinite article in cell.rs)
 - rust-lang#81831 (Don't display `mut` in arguments for functions documentation)
 - rust-lang#81947 (Relax ItemCtxt::to_ty lifetime)
 - rust-lang#81954 (RELEASES.md 1.50: Group platform support notes together)
 - rust-lang#81955 (bootstrap: Locate llvm-dwp based on llvm-config bindir)
 - rust-lang#81959 (Fix assosiated typo)
 - rust-lang#81964 (Fix documentation not showing on localStorage error)
 - rust-lang#81968 (bootstrap: fix wrong docs installation path)
 - rust-lang#81990 (Make suggestion of changing mutability of arguments broader)
 - rust-lang#81994 (Improve long explanation for E0542 and E0546)
 - rust-lang#81997 (dist: include src/build_helper as part of the crate graph for rustc-dev)
 - rust-lang#82003 (Stack probes: fix error message)
 - rust-lang#82004 (clean up clean::Static struct)
 - rust-lang#82011 (Fix private intra-doc warnings on associated items)
 - rust-lang#82013 (Tell user how to fix CI file being not up to date)
 - rust-lang#82017 (Fix typo in mod.rs)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1a9d20b into rust-lang:master Feb 12, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.52.0 milestone Feb 12, 2021
@GuillaumeGomez GuillaumeGomez deleted the clean-static-struct branch February 12, 2021 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-cleanup Category: PRs that clean code up or issues documenting cleanup. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants