Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize is_sorted for Range and RangeInclusive #89335

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 30, 2021

Conversation

mbrubeck
Copy link
Contributor

@mbrubeck mbrubeck commented Sep 28, 2021

The Step trait guarantees that Range<impl Step> yields items in sorted order. We can override Iterator::is_sorted based on this guarantee, as we already do for Iterator::min and max.

Thank you to @fiveseven-lambda who pointed this out on the Rust Users Forum.

The `Step` trait guarantees that `Range<impl Step>` yields items in
sorted order.  We can override the `Iterator::is_sorted` method based on
this guarantee, as we already do for `Iterator::min` and `max`.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

r? @scottmcm

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Sep 28, 2021
@mbrubeck mbrubeck added A-iterators Area: Iterators T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 28, 2021
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Sep 28, 2021

r? @cuviper
@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Sep 28, 2021

📌 Commit 830ecbd has been approved by cuviper

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned cuviper and unassigned scottmcm Sep 28, 2021
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Sep 28, 2021
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2021
Optimize is_sorted for Range and RangeInclusive

The [`Step`] trait guarantees that `Range<impl Step>` yields items in sorted order.  We can override `Iterator::is_sorted` based on this guarantee, as we already do for `Iterator::min` and `max`.

Thank you to `@fiveseven-lambda` who pointed this out [on the Rust Users Forum](https://users.rust-lang.org/t/is-sorted-method-in-impl-iterator-for-range/64717).

[`Step`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/iter/trait.Step.html
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2021
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#87428 (Fix union keyword highlighting in rustdoc HTML sources)
 - rust-lang#88412 (Remove ignore-tidy-undocumented-unsafe from core::slice::sort)
 - rust-lang#89098 (Fix generics where bounds order)
 - rust-lang#89232 (Improve help for recursion limit errors)
 - rust-lang#89294 (:arrow_up: rust-analyzer)
 - rust-lang#89297 (Remove Never variant from clean::Type enum)
 - rust-lang#89311 (Add unit assignment to MIR for `asm!()`)
 - rust-lang#89313 (PassWrapper: handle function rename from upstream D36850)
 - rust-lang#89315 (Clarify that `CString::from_vec_unchecked` appends 0 byte.)
 - rust-lang#89335 (Optimize is_sorted for Range and RangeInclusive)
 - rust-lang#89366 (rustdoc: Remove lazy_static dependency)
 - rust-lang#89377 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#89378 (Update books)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 8f9f3aa into rust-lang:master Sep 30, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.57.0 milestone Sep 30, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-iterators Area: Iterators S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants